Is Salesforce to Salesforce outdated? If so, what is the best way to connect client orgs to hub org?
Our business provides a software service to clients using Salesforce Platform(Force.com Partner portal), where we have our own main org (hub) and each client gets their own org (a spoke) which connects to the hub. We are the administrators of all the orgs with the clients managing their own data. I'm interested to know whether Salesfore-to-Salesforce is still the way to go - I was told recently that this is outdated. I'd appreciate any input from the SF community if that is correct or if there is a better to do this in the future?
environment-hub salesforce-to-salesforce
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
add a comment |
Our business provides a software service to clients using Salesforce Platform(Force.com Partner portal), where we have our own main org (hub) and each client gets their own org (a spoke) which connects to the hub. We are the administrators of all the orgs with the clients managing their own data. I'm interested to know whether Salesfore-to-Salesforce is still the way to go - I was told recently that this is outdated. I'd appreciate any input from the SF community if that is correct or if there is a better to do this in the future?
environment-hub salesforce-to-salesforce
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
add a comment |
Our business provides a software service to clients using Salesforce Platform(Force.com Partner portal), where we have our own main org (hub) and each client gets their own org (a spoke) which connects to the hub. We are the administrators of all the orgs with the clients managing their own data. I'm interested to know whether Salesfore-to-Salesforce is still the way to go - I was told recently that this is outdated. I'd appreciate any input from the SF community if that is correct or if there is a better to do this in the future?
environment-hub salesforce-to-salesforce
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
Our business provides a software service to clients using Salesforce Platform(Force.com Partner portal), where we have our own main org (hub) and each client gets their own org (a spoke) which connects to the hub. We are the administrators of all the orgs with the clients managing their own data. I'm interested to know whether Salesfore-to-Salesforce is still the way to go - I was told recently that this is outdated. I'd appreciate any input from the SF community if that is correct or if there is a better to do this in the future?
environment-hub salesforce-to-salesforce
environment-hub salesforce-to-salesforce
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
asked 4 hours ago
IreneIrene
4762417
4762417
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This classifies as a broad question and is primarily opinion based. I will still try to provide some information in this direction.
I haven't really heard of that Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S) is being deprecated. S2S operates on a Pub/Sub model, i.e., you publish the objects/fields and all connected instances subscribe to it. Very recently with the advent of Platform Events and Change Data Capture, the Pub/Sub model has found new implementation approaches. And that you can utilize these approaches based on your Use Case.
S2S compared to say Platform Events or Change Data Capture does have its significant benefits e.g., not requiring any other tools to connect and subscribe to data, which is required in case of subscribers subscribing to Platform Events or Change Data Capture events to implement subscription using CometD.
Primarily, it all depends how and what you want to implement which typically depends on lots of factors viz., skills, resources, tools and most importantly time to market. In your current structure, I would think as long as S2S is well established, there is no need to change the architecture until you really have compelling reasons to do so.
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f250628%2fis-salesforce-to-salesforce-outdated-if-so-what-is-the-best-way-to-connect-cli%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This classifies as a broad question and is primarily opinion based. I will still try to provide some information in this direction.
I haven't really heard of that Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S) is being deprecated. S2S operates on a Pub/Sub model, i.e., you publish the objects/fields and all connected instances subscribe to it. Very recently with the advent of Platform Events and Change Data Capture, the Pub/Sub model has found new implementation approaches. And that you can utilize these approaches based on your Use Case.
S2S compared to say Platform Events or Change Data Capture does have its significant benefits e.g., not requiring any other tools to connect and subscribe to data, which is required in case of subscribers subscribing to Platform Events or Change Data Capture events to implement subscription using CometD.
Primarily, it all depends how and what you want to implement which typically depends on lots of factors viz., skills, resources, tools and most importantly time to market. In your current structure, I would think as long as S2S is well established, there is no need to change the architecture until you really have compelling reasons to do so.
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
add a comment |
This classifies as a broad question and is primarily opinion based. I will still try to provide some information in this direction.
I haven't really heard of that Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S) is being deprecated. S2S operates on a Pub/Sub model, i.e., you publish the objects/fields and all connected instances subscribe to it. Very recently with the advent of Platform Events and Change Data Capture, the Pub/Sub model has found new implementation approaches. And that you can utilize these approaches based on your Use Case.
S2S compared to say Platform Events or Change Data Capture does have its significant benefits e.g., not requiring any other tools to connect and subscribe to data, which is required in case of subscribers subscribing to Platform Events or Change Data Capture events to implement subscription using CometD.
Primarily, it all depends how and what you want to implement which typically depends on lots of factors viz., skills, resources, tools and most importantly time to market. In your current structure, I would think as long as S2S is well established, there is no need to change the architecture until you really have compelling reasons to do so.
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
add a comment |
This classifies as a broad question and is primarily opinion based. I will still try to provide some information in this direction.
I haven't really heard of that Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S) is being deprecated. S2S operates on a Pub/Sub model, i.e., you publish the objects/fields and all connected instances subscribe to it. Very recently with the advent of Platform Events and Change Data Capture, the Pub/Sub model has found new implementation approaches. And that you can utilize these approaches based on your Use Case.
S2S compared to say Platform Events or Change Data Capture does have its significant benefits e.g., not requiring any other tools to connect and subscribe to data, which is required in case of subscribers subscribing to Platform Events or Change Data Capture events to implement subscription using CometD.
Primarily, it all depends how and what you want to implement which typically depends on lots of factors viz., skills, resources, tools and most importantly time to market. In your current structure, I would think as long as S2S is well established, there is no need to change the architecture until you really have compelling reasons to do so.
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
This classifies as a broad question and is primarily opinion based. I will still try to provide some information in this direction.
I haven't really heard of that Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S) is being deprecated. S2S operates on a Pub/Sub model, i.e., you publish the objects/fields and all connected instances subscribe to it. Very recently with the advent of Platform Events and Change Data Capture, the Pub/Sub model has found new implementation approaches. And that you can utilize these approaches based on your Use Case.
S2S compared to say Platform Events or Change Data Capture does have its significant benefits e.g., not requiring any other tools to connect and subscribe to data, which is required in case of subscribers subscribing to Platform Events or Change Data Capture events to implement subscription using CometD.
Primarily, it all depends how and what you want to implement which typically depends on lots of factors viz., skills, resources, tools and most importantly time to market. In your current structure, I would think as long as S2S is well established, there is no need to change the architecture until you really have compelling reasons to do so.
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
14.6k2824
14.6k2824
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f250628%2fis-salesforce-to-salesforce-outdated-if-so-what-is-the-best-way-to-connect-cli%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
