Rubik's cube 4x4 parity moves












5












$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32
















5












$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Note: since asking this question I've purchased several other twisty puzzles and now regret taking the "look up algorithms online" approach to solving - in the end I get much more enjoyment from the puzzles where I worked out to solve them myself than the ones where I didn't. If you're stuck at this point I would recommend seeking resources to understand the concept of parity and then try to come up with a solution yourself. You won't end up with a super efficient algorithm, but you will understand it, which is ultimately more satisfying. Or it is for me at least. That said, answers to this question are still welcome.



I'm solving my 4x4 Rubik's cube (aka Rubik's revenge) for the first time, and I have the "OLL parity" case:



enter image description here



There are plenty of algorithms for this available online, but different people use different notation and nobody ever says which one they're using, so I risk messing up my cube if I guess wrongly.



So, please give me algorithms for solving the OLL parity, using the following notation:





  • R: turn just the rightmost face clockwise


  • Rw (R wide): turn the rightmost half of the cube clockwise, i.e. the rightmost face and the slice adjacent to it


  • r: turn the rightmost slice clockwise, but not the rightmost face


  • R2, Rw2, r2: as above but turning it twice


  • R', Rw', r': as above but turning it anticlockwise


  • L, F, B, U, D: left, front, back, up, down. (All clockwise by default, can be modified as above)


  • x: if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • - (hyphen): if you use this, please explain what it means, as I have no clue.


  • (, ) (parentheses): if you use these, please explain what they mean, as I have no clue.


If you use anything else at all in your notation, please explain what it means. If you prefer a different notation from the above that's fine, but please explain it.



I'm holding my cube with the unsolved cubies facing me at the top. (i.e. the red face would be the front in the diagram above.) If I should start in some other orientation, please say so.



It would be helpful to have an algorithm that leaves all other pieces alone, as my cube is in exactly the almost-solved state above. But if algorithms that don't do this are significantly shorter and/or easier to remember then that would be fine too. (Please tell me which I can expect in your answer!)







rubiks-cube






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 '18 at 7:40







Nathaniel

















asked Apr 21 '18 at 4:22









NathanielNathaniel

454619




454619








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Apr 28 '18 at 13:32








1




1




$begingroup$
Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 28 '18 at 13:32




$begingroup$
Has a useful answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Apr 28 '18 at 13:32










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
    $endgroup$
    – Nathaniel
    May 13 '18 at 9:12












  • $begingroup$
    I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
    $endgroup$
    – StevenWhite
    May 14 '18 at 5:27



















1












$begingroup$

I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




r U2 r

U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

U2 r U2 r' U2 l

r'

r' U2 r'







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



    x, y, z :




    These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




    -: I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



    ( )




    ! These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.
    You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')






    share








    New contributor




    FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "559"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64536%2frubiks-cube-4x4-parity-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




      Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




      So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



      The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12












      • $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27
















      3












      $begingroup$

      Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




      Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




      So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



      The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12












      • $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$

      Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




      Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




      So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



      The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Here is the algorithm I use (from http://www.rubiksplace.com/cubes/4x4/), but using your notation:




      Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'




      So it's basically a bunch of half cube turns and top face 180 degree turns.



      The "x" means you rotate the cube clockwise along the x-axis. In other words, if the Red face was facing you, it will move to the top while the sides stay the same color.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 25 '18 at 22:58









      StevenWhiteStevenWhite

      347110




      347110












      • $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12












      • $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27


















      • $begingroup$
        It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
        $endgroup$
        – Nathaniel
        May 13 '18 at 9:12












      • $begingroup$
        I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
        $endgroup$
        – StevenWhite
        May 14 '18 at 5:27
















      $begingroup$
      It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
      $endgroup$
      – Nathaniel
      May 13 '18 at 9:12






      $begingroup$
      It doesn't matter how carefully I perform this move, whether directly from this answer or elsewhere, it always completely messes up the cube. (Or to be precise, it does remove the parity, but it scrambles it as a 3x3 so I have to solve it again using 3x3 moves.) I must be making a mistake, but I've no idea what. Sorry, I thought asking for more precise notation would help.
      $endgroup$
      – Nathaniel
      May 13 '18 at 9:12














      $begingroup$
      I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
      $endgroup$
      – StevenWhite
      May 14 '18 at 5:27




      $begingroup$
      I just tried it again to make sure it works. Maybe watching someone do it will help: youtu.be/DX5aGS5k2o8
      $endgroup$
      – StevenWhite
      May 14 '18 at 5:27











      1












      $begingroup$

      I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




      r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




      If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




      r U2 r

      U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

      U2 r U2 r' U2 l

      r'

      r' U2 r'







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




        r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




        If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




        r U2 r

        U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

        U2 r U2 r' U2 l

        r'

        r' U2 r'







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




          r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




          If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




          r U2 r

          U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

          U2 r U2 r' U2 l

          r'

          r' U2 r'







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I use the following that leaves all the other cubes alone:




          r U2 r U2 r' U2 r U2 l' U2 r U2 r' U2 lr' r' U2 r'




          If you look at it this way, the net effect is just an r' :




          r U2 r

          U2 r' U2 r U2 l'

          U2 r U2 r' U2 l

          r'

          r' U2 r'








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 12 '18 at 8:32









          AHKieran

          5,5241143




          5,5241143










          answered Nov 12 '18 at 5:33









          Bradley ReedBradley Reed

          111




          111























              0












              $begingroup$

              Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



              x, y, z :




              These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




              -: I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



              ( )




              ! These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.
              You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')






              share








              New contributor




              FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                x, y, z :




                These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                -: I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                ( )




                ! These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.
                You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')






                share








                New contributor




                FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                  x, y, z :




                  These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                  -: I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                  ( )




                  ! These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.
                  You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')






                  share








                  New contributor




                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  Not technically an answer, but here is the meaning of the symbols:



                  x, y, z :




                  These are notation for rotation of the entire cube. they mean to rotate following the R, U, and F moves, respectively.




                  -: I don't know what the hyphen means. Can you tell me where you saw the hyphen?



                  ( )




                  ! These don't change what to do, they just tell you what moves are triggers, or sets of moves that repeat through many algorithms.
                  You usually see them around sets of moves like (R U R' U') (R' F R F') and (R U2 R')







                  share








                  New contributor




                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share


                  share






                  New contributor




                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 3 mins ago









                  FluxDigital1FluxDigital1

                  111




                  111




                  New contributor




                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  FluxDigital1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64536%2frubiks-cube-4x4-parity-moves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What are all the squawk codes?

                      What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

                      Hudsonelva