Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade: Utility against creatures with immunity to non-magical damage?












1












$begingroup$


Both Booming Blade and Green Flame Blade have the following text:




You make a single melee weapon attack against a creature you can see within the spell's range. If the attack hits...




Reading this question makes me believe that a weapon which has been magically enchanted or enhanced, even temporarily, would overcome this immunity, and that both base weapon damage and cantrip damage would apply on a hit (and double on a critical hit).



Question: What damage, if any, would be generated by attacking a creature (with immunity to damage from non-magical weapons) with a non-magical weapon as part of a Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade attack?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Both Booming Blade and Green Flame Blade have the following text:




    You make a single melee weapon attack against a creature you can see within the spell's range. If the attack hits...




    Reading this question makes me believe that a weapon which has been magically enchanted or enhanced, even temporarily, would overcome this immunity, and that both base weapon damage and cantrip damage would apply on a hit (and double on a critical hit).



    Question: What damage, if any, would be generated by attacking a creature (with immunity to damage from non-magical weapons) with a non-magical weapon as part of a Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade attack?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Both Booming Blade and Green Flame Blade have the following text:




      You make a single melee weapon attack against a creature you can see within the spell's range. If the attack hits...




      Reading this question makes me believe that a weapon which has been magically enchanted or enhanced, even temporarily, would overcome this immunity, and that both base weapon damage and cantrip damage would apply on a hit (and double on a critical hit).



      Question: What damage, if any, would be generated by attacking a creature (with immunity to damage from non-magical weapons) with a non-magical weapon as part of a Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade attack?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Both Booming Blade and Green Flame Blade have the following text:




      You make a single melee weapon attack against a creature you can see within the spell's range. If the attack hits...




      Reading this question makes me believe that a weapon which has been magically enchanted or enhanced, even temporarily, would overcome this immunity, and that both base weapon damage and cantrip damage would apply on a hit (and double on a critical hit).



      Question: What damage, if any, would be generated by attacking a creature (with immunity to damage from non-magical weapons) with a non-magical weapon as part of a Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade attack?







      dnd-5e spells damage immunities






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 58 mins ago









      V2Blast

      20.9k360132




      20.9k360132










      asked 1 hour ago









      DavoDavo

      4721314




      4721314






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Only the cantrip's extra damage would damage the creature



          As part of both cantrips' effect, extra damage is dealt. If it had said the weapon's damage was changed, the weapon's damage would have been effective.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            The base weapon attack that's part of the cantrip doesn't become magical.



            Jeremy Crawford, official 5e rules designer, addresses this question here:




            Is the attack made as part of Booming Blade magical? It's delivered as part of a spell, but has its "usual effects" and is a prerequisite for the spell to work.



            The booming blade spell isn't intended to make the required weapon attack magical.




            So the weapon attack you make as part of the spell is not magical on its own.



            ...But the extra damage is magical.



            The booming blade spell description says:




            As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and it becomes sheathed in booming energy until the start of your next turn. If the target willingly moves before then, it immediately takes 1d8 thunder damage, and the spell ends.




            Similarly, green-flame blade says:




            As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and green fire leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice that you can see within 5 feet of it. The second creature takes fire damage equal to your spellcasting ability modifier.




            When the caster of either cantrip reaches higher levels, the initial attack does extra damage as well (in addition to boosting the secondary damage).



            Per Crawford's ruling above, the required weapon attack remains nonmagical; the fact that the spell calls for a normal weapon attack doesn't change the properties of the weapon. However, the added damage done by the spell itself is magical, as it's caused directly by the spell. This is true both of the secondary damage of both spells, and of the extra initial damage both spells do at higher levels.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "122"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139922%2fbooming-blade-or-green-flame-blade-utility-against-creatures-with-immunity-to-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              Only the cantrip's extra damage would damage the creature



              As part of both cantrips' effect, extra damage is dealt. If it had said the weapon's damage was changed, the weapon's damage would have been effective.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                Only the cantrip's extra damage would damage the creature



                As part of both cantrips' effect, extra damage is dealt. If it had said the weapon's damage was changed, the weapon's damage would have been effective.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Only the cantrip's extra damage would damage the creature



                  As part of both cantrips' effect, extra damage is dealt. If it had said the weapon's damage was changed, the weapon's damage would have been effective.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Only the cantrip's extra damage would damage the creature



                  As part of both cantrips' effect, extra damage is dealt. If it had said the weapon's damage was changed, the weapon's damage would have been effective.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 50 mins ago









                  V2Blast

                  20.9k360132




                  20.9k360132










                  answered 50 mins ago









                  RallozarXRallozarX

                  3827




                  3827

























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      The base weapon attack that's part of the cantrip doesn't become magical.



                      Jeremy Crawford, official 5e rules designer, addresses this question here:




                      Is the attack made as part of Booming Blade magical? It's delivered as part of a spell, but has its "usual effects" and is a prerequisite for the spell to work.



                      The booming blade spell isn't intended to make the required weapon attack magical.




                      So the weapon attack you make as part of the spell is not magical on its own.



                      ...But the extra damage is magical.



                      The booming blade spell description says:




                      As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and it becomes sheathed in booming energy until the start of your next turn. If the target willingly moves before then, it immediately takes 1d8 thunder damage, and the spell ends.




                      Similarly, green-flame blade says:




                      As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and green fire leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice that you can see within 5 feet of it. The second creature takes fire damage equal to your spellcasting ability modifier.




                      When the caster of either cantrip reaches higher levels, the initial attack does extra damage as well (in addition to boosting the secondary damage).



                      Per Crawford's ruling above, the required weapon attack remains nonmagical; the fact that the spell calls for a normal weapon attack doesn't change the properties of the weapon. However, the added damage done by the spell itself is magical, as it's caused directly by the spell. This is true both of the secondary damage of both spells, and of the extra initial damage both spells do at higher levels.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        The base weapon attack that's part of the cantrip doesn't become magical.



                        Jeremy Crawford, official 5e rules designer, addresses this question here:




                        Is the attack made as part of Booming Blade magical? It's delivered as part of a spell, but has its "usual effects" and is a prerequisite for the spell to work.



                        The booming blade spell isn't intended to make the required weapon attack magical.




                        So the weapon attack you make as part of the spell is not magical on its own.



                        ...But the extra damage is magical.



                        The booming blade spell description says:




                        As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and it becomes sheathed in booming energy until the start of your next turn. If the target willingly moves before then, it immediately takes 1d8 thunder damage, and the spell ends.




                        Similarly, green-flame blade says:




                        As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and green fire leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice that you can see within 5 feet of it. The second creature takes fire damage equal to your spellcasting ability modifier.




                        When the caster of either cantrip reaches higher levels, the initial attack does extra damage as well (in addition to boosting the secondary damage).



                        Per Crawford's ruling above, the required weapon attack remains nonmagical; the fact that the spell calls for a normal weapon attack doesn't change the properties of the weapon. However, the added damage done by the spell itself is magical, as it's caused directly by the spell. This is true both of the secondary damage of both spells, and of the extra initial damage both spells do at higher levels.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          The base weapon attack that's part of the cantrip doesn't become magical.



                          Jeremy Crawford, official 5e rules designer, addresses this question here:




                          Is the attack made as part of Booming Blade magical? It's delivered as part of a spell, but has its "usual effects" and is a prerequisite for the spell to work.



                          The booming blade spell isn't intended to make the required weapon attack magical.




                          So the weapon attack you make as part of the spell is not magical on its own.



                          ...But the extra damage is magical.



                          The booming blade spell description says:




                          As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and it becomes sheathed in booming energy until the start of your next turn. If the target willingly moves before then, it immediately takes 1d8 thunder damage, and the spell ends.




                          Similarly, green-flame blade says:




                          As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and green fire leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice that you can see within 5 feet of it. The second creature takes fire damage equal to your spellcasting ability modifier.




                          When the caster of either cantrip reaches higher levels, the initial attack does extra damage as well (in addition to boosting the secondary damage).



                          Per Crawford's ruling above, the required weapon attack remains nonmagical; the fact that the spell calls for a normal weapon attack doesn't change the properties of the weapon. However, the added damage done by the spell itself is magical, as it's caused directly by the spell. This is true both of the secondary damage of both spells, and of the extra initial damage both spells do at higher levels.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The base weapon attack that's part of the cantrip doesn't become magical.



                          Jeremy Crawford, official 5e rules designer, addresses this question here:




                          Is the attack made as part of Booming Blade magical? It's delivered as part of a spell, but has its "usual effects" and is a prerequisite for the spell to work.



                          The booming blade spell isn't intended to make the required weapon attack magical.




                          So the weapon attack you make as part of the spell is not magical on its own.



                          ...But the extra damage is magical.



                          The booming blade spell description says:




                          As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and it becomes sheathed in booming energy until the start of your next turn. If the target willingly moves before then, it immediately takes 1d8 thunder damage, and the spell ends.




                          Similarly, green-flame blade says:




                          As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell’s range, otherwise the spell fails. On a hit, the target suffers the attack’s normal effects, and green fire leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice that you can see within 5 feet of it. The second creature takes fire damage equal to your spellcasting ability modifier.




                          When the caster of either cantrip reaches higher levels, the initial attack does extra damage as well (in addition to boosting the secondary damage).



                          Per Crawford's ruling above, the required weapon attack remains nonmagical; the fact that the spell calls for a normal weapon attack doesn't change the properties of the weapon. However, the added damage done by the spell itself is magical, as it's caused directly by the spell. This is true both of the secondary damage of both spells, and of the extra initial damage both spells do at higher levels.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 45 mins ago









                          V2BlastV2Blast

                          20.9k360132




                          20.9k360132






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139922%2fbooming-blade-or-green-flame-blade-utility-against-creatures-with-immunity-to-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What are all the squawk codes?

                              What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

                              Hudsonelva