Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?












2












$begingroup$


I can't come up with a single one.



The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^{-x}$ only maps to half of the real line.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    $f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
    $endgroup$
    – cammil
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
    $endgroup$
    – Jake
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    2 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


I can't come up with a single one.



The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^{-x}$ only maps to half of the real line.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    $f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
    $endgroup$
    – cammil
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
    $endgroup$
    – Jake
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    2 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I can't come up with a single one.



The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^{-x}$ only maps to half of the real line.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I can't come up with a single one.



The range should be the whole of the reals. The best I have is $log(x)$ but that's only on the positive real line. And there's $f(x) = x$, but this is not strictly concave. And $-e^{-x}$ only maps to half of the real line.



Any ideas?







real-analysis functions recreational-mathematics real-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago







cammil

















asked 4 hours ago









cammilcammil

1264




1264








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    $f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
    $endgroup$
    – cammil
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
    $endgroup$
    – Jake
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    2 hours ago














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    $f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hoppe
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
    $endgroup$
    – cammil
    3 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
    $endgroup$
    – Jake
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    2 hours ago








5




5




$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
$f(x) = -e^{-x}$?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler I was just about to write the same, +1.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
$endgroup$
– cammil
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
Sorry, I should have made clear, it should map to the whole of the reals. (What's the mathematical term for that?)
$endgroup$
– cammil
3 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
@cammil a surjection (i.e. a function whose range is equal to its codomain).
$endgroup$
– Jake
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
If you start with the lower right branch of the hyperbola $xy=-1$ and transform the coordinates to slope the $x$ axis upward to the right and the $y$ axis rightward toward the top, you will have another choice.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

How about



$f(x)=left{begin{array}{cc} ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^{-x}& &x<0end{array}right.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    $$
    f(x) = x-e^{-x}
    $$

    is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^{-x}$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.



    Even better,
    $$
    f(x) = 2x -sqrt{1+3x^2}
    $$

    has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^{-3/2} < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^{-1}(x) = 2x+sqrt{1+3x^2}$, clearly defined for all $x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
      $endgroup$
      – Calum Gilhooley
      2 hours ago





















    0












    $begingroup$

    $F(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158452%2fis-there-an-injective-monotonically-increasing-strictly-concave-function-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      How about



      $f(x)=left{begin{array}{cc} ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^{-x}& &x<0end{array}right.$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        How about



        $f(x)=left{begin{array}{cc} ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^{-x}& &x<0end{array}right.$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          How about



          $f(x)=left{begin{array}{cc} ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^{-x}& &x<0end{array}right.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          How about



          $f(x)=left{begin{array}{cc} ln(x+1)& &xge 0\1-e^{-x}& &x<0end{array}right.$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          paw88789paw88789

          29.4k12349




          29.4k12349























              4












              $begingroup$

              $$
              f(x) = x-e^{-x}
              $$

              is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^{-x}$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.



              Even better,
              $$
              f(x) = 2x -sqrt{1+3x^2}
              $$

              has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^{-3/2} < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^{-1}(x) = 2x+sqrt{1+3x^2}$, clearly defined for all $x$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
                $endgroup$
                – Calum Gilhooley
                2 hours ago


















              4












              $begingroup$

              $$
              f(x) = x-e^{-x}
              $$

              is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^{-x}$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.



              Even better,
              $$
              f(x) = 2x -sqrt{1+3x^2}
              $$

              has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^{-3/2} < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^{-1}(x) = 2x+sqrt{1+3x^2}$, clearly defined for all $x$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
                $endgroup$
                – Calum Gilhooley
                2 hours ago
















              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$

              $$
              f(x) = x-e^{-x}
              $$

              is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^{-x}$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.



              Even better,
              $$
              f(x) = 2x -sqrt{1+3x^2}
              $$

              has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^{-3/2} < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^{-1}(x) = 2x+sqrt{1+3x^2}$, clearly defined for all $x$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              $$
              f(x) = x-e^{-x}
              $$

              is such a function. Since $f''(x) = -e^{-x}$ is always negative, it is strictly concave, and it's not hard to show it hits every real.



              Even better,
              $$
              f(x) = 2x -sqrt{1+3x^2}
              $$

              has $f''(x) = -3(1+3x^2)^{-3/2} < 0$ everywhere and the explicit inverse $f^{-1}(x) = 2x+sqrt{1+3x^2}$, clearly defined for all $x$.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 3 hours ago

























              answered 3 hours ago









              eyeballfrogeyeballfrog

              6,664630




              6,664630












              • $begingroup$
                +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
                $endgroup$
                – Calum Gilhooley
                2 hours ago




















              • $begingroup$
                +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
                $endgroup$
                – Calum Gilhooley
                2 hours ago


















              $begingroup$
              +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
              $endgroup$
              – Calum Gilhooley
              2 hours ago






              $begingroup$
              +1 (All hail the Hypnotoad!) Dare I ask how you found the second example? I had to work a bit even to check the inverse formula. I assume I'm missing something really neat.
              $endgroup$
              – Calum Gilhooley
              2 hours ago













              0












              $begingroup$

              $F(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                $F(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $F(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $F(x) = pi x+ int_0^x arctan (-t),dt$ is an example. Many more examples like this one can be constructed.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  zhw.zhw.

                  74.5k43175




                  74.5k43175






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158452%2fis-there-an-injective-monotonically-increasing-strictly-concave-function-from%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?

                      Waikiki

                      What are all the squawk codes?