Combinatorics problem on counting.












4












$begingroup$


How many positive integers n are there such that all of the following take place:



1) n has 1000 digits.



2) all of the digits are odd.



3) the absolute value of the difference of any two consecutive (neighboring) digits is equal to 2.



Please help. I don’t even know how to start.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


How many positive integers n are there such that all of the following take place:



1) n has 1000 digits.



2) all of the digits are odd.



3) the absolute value of the difference of any two consecutive (neighboring) digits is equal to 2.



Please help. I don’t even know how to start.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


How many positive integers n are there such that all of the following take place:



1) n has 1000 digits.



2) all of the digits are odd.



3) the absolute value of the difference of any two consecutive (neighboring) digits is equal to 2.



Please help. I don’t even know how to start.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




How many positive integers n are there such that all of the following take place:



1) n has 1000 digits.



2) all of the digits are odd.



3) the absolute value of the difference of any two consecutive (neighboring) digits is equal to 2.



Please help. I don’t even know how to start.







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









furfurfurfur

1119




1119












  • $begingroup$
    Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
    $endgroup$
    – Vasya
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
$endgroup$
– Vasya
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
Start with an easier problem: how many two-digit numbers are there? what about three-digit?
$endgroup$
– Vasya
4 hours ago














$begingroup$
I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
$endgroup$
– furfur
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
I could simply guess the case of two digit numbers. How does it help me prove the general one?
$endgroup$
– furfur
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
$endgroup$
– Vasya
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
You do not need to guess, you can count. How many choices for the first digit do you have? what about the second?
$endgroup$
– Vasya
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
$endgroup$
– furfur
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
For the first digit (call it a1) there are 5 choices. For the second digit at most 2 choices. Either a1-2 or a1+2. But it depends if a1 is greater than 2/ smaller than 8 etc. I’m stuck on this.
$endgroup$
– furfur
4 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Letting $a_m$ be the number of such integers with $m$ digits, then $a_m$ obeys the recurrence $$a_m=4a_{m-2}-3a_{m-4}qquad text{for all }mge 6.$$ The proof is based on Julian Mejia's answer, along with the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, but perhaps you can give a combinatorial proof of that recurrence, then solve it.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Define $n_i=2i-1$ (so a bijection between 1,2,3,4,5 with 1,3,5,7,9).
Consider the 5x5 matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ with $a_{i,j}=1$ if $n_i$ and $n_j$ differ by 2 and $a_{i,j}=0$ otherwise. Then, the number of positive integers with "m" digits satisfying your properties is the sum of entries of $A^{m-1}$. So you want to find the sum of entries of $A^{999}$. I don't know if this is easy to compute without computers.



Edit:
We have $$A=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
0&1&0&0&0\
1&0&1&0&0\
0&1&0&1&0\
0&0&1&0&1\
0&0&0&1&0\
end{array}
right)$$

So, thanks to @Mike's comment, it shouldn't be difficult to find the entries of $A^{999}$ we have that $A=PDP^{-1}$ with



$$D=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
-1&0&0&0&0\
0&0&0&0&0\
0&0&1&0&0\
0&0&0&-sqrt{3}&0\
0&0&0&0&sqrt{3}\
end{array}
right)$$



$$P=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
-1&1&-1&1&1\
1&0&-1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
0&-1&0&2&2\
-1&0&1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
1&1&1&1&1\
end{array}
right)$$

So, we can compute $A^{999}=PD^{999}P^{-1}$ whose entries will be a linear combination of $(-1)^{999}, (1)^{999}, (-sqrt{3})^{999},(sqrt{3})^{999}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

Here is a OCaml program that computes the number of numbers in term of the size of the number:



type 'a stream= Eos| StrCons of 'a * (unit-> 'a stream)


let hdStr (s: 'a stream) : 'a =
match s with
| Eos -> failwith "headless stream"
| StrCons (x,_) -> x;;

let tlStr (s : 'a stream) : 'a stream =
match s with
| Eos -> failwith "empty stream"
| StrCons (x, t) -> t ();;



let rec listify (s : 'a stream) (n: int) : 'a list =
if n <= 0 then
else
match s with
| Eos ->
| _ -> (hdStr s) :: listify (tlStr s) (n - 1);;

let rec howmanynumber start step=
if step = 0 then 1 else
match start with
|1->howmanynumber 3 (step-1)
|3->howmanynumber 1 (step-1) + howmanynumber 5 (step-1)
|5->howmanynumber 3 (step-1) + howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
|7->howmanynumber 5 (step-1) + howmanynumber 9 (step-1)
|9->howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
|_->failwith "exception error"



let count n=
(howmanynumber 1 n)+(howmanynumber 3 n)+(howmanynumber 5 n)+(howmanynumber 7 n)+(howmanynumber 9 n)

let rec thisseq n = StrCons(count n , fun ()-> thisseq (n+1))

let result = thisseq 1


So Based on @Julian solution, the answer is the sum of entries of



$begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
end{bmatrix}^{999} * begin{bmatrix}
1 \
1 \
1 \
1 \
1 \
end{bmatrix}$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

The text was too lengthy for a comment and aims on finalizing the previous answers and comments, which boil down to a very simple final answer for $nge2$: $$a_n=begin{cases}hphantom18cdot 3^{frac{n-2}2},& ntext{ even},\14 cdot 3^{frac{n-3}2},& ntext{ odd}.end{cases}tag1$$



The most simple way to prove $(1)$ is to count directly the number of ways for the cases $n=2,3,4,5$ obtaining $a_n=8,14,24,42$, and then proceed by induction applying the recurrence relation suggested by Mike Earnest on the base of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix introduced by Julian Mejia:
$$
a_n=4a_{n-2}-3a_{n-4}.tag2
$$



In fact the simplicity of the answer suggests that there is possibly a simpler way to prove $(2)$ or even directly $(1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192709%2fcombinatorics-problem-on-counting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Define $n_i=2i-1$ (so a bijection between 1,2,3,4,5 with 1,3,5,7,9).
    Consider the 5x5 matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ with $a_{i,j}=1$ if $n_i$ and $n_j$ differ by 2 and $a_{i,j}=0$ otherwise. Then, the number of positive integers with "m" digits satisfying your properties is the sum of entries of $A^{m-1}$. So you want to find the sum of entries of $A^{999}$. I don't know if this is easy to compute without computers.



    Edit:
    We have $$A=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    0&1&0&0&0\
    1&0&1&0&0\
    0&1&0&1&0\
    0&0&1&0&1\
    0&0&0&1&0\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, thanks to @Mike's comment, it shouldn't be difficult to find the entries of $A^{999}$ we have that $A=PDP^{-1}$ with



    $$D=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&1&0&0\
    0&0&0&-sqrt{3}&0\
    0&0&0&0&sqrt{3}\
    end{array}
    right)$$



    $$P=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&1&-1&1&1\
    1&0&-1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    0&-1&0&2&2\
    -1&0&1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    1&1&1&1&1\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, we can compute $A^{999}=PD^{999}P^{-1}$ whose entries will be a linear combination of $(-1)^{999}, (1)^{999}, (-sqrt{3})^{999},(sqrt{3})^{999}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      3 hours ago
















    2












    $begingroup$

    Define $n_i=2i-1$ (so a bijection between 1,2,3,4,5 with 1,3,5,7,9).
    Consider the 5x5 matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ with $a_{i,j}=1$ if $n_i$ and $n_j$ differ by 2 and $a_{i,j}=0$ otherwise. Then, the number of positive integers with "m" digits satisfying your properties is the sum of entries of $A^{m-1}$. So you want to find the sum of entries of $A^{999}$. I don't know if this is easy to compute without computers.



    Edit:
    We have $$A=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    0&1&0&0&0\
    1&0&1&0&0\
    0&1&0&1&0\
    0&0&1&0&1\
    0&0&0&1&0\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, thanks to @Mike's comment, it shouldn't be difficult to find the entries of $A^{999}$ we have that $A=PDP^{-1}$ with



    $$D=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&1&0&0\
    0&0&0&-sqrt{3}&0\
    0&0&0&0&sqrt{3}\
    end{array}
    right)$$



    $$P=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&1&-1&1&1\
    1&0&-1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    0&-1&0&2&2\
    -1&0&1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    1&1&1&1&1\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, we can compute $A^{999}=PD^{999}P^{-1}$ whose entries will be a linear combination of $(-1)^{999}, (1)^{999}, (-sqrt{3})^{999},(sqrt{3})^{999}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      3 hours ago














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Define $n_i=2i-1$ (so a bijection between 1,2,3,4,5 with 1,3,5,7,9).
    Consider the 5x5 matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ with $a_{i,j}=1$ if $n_i$ and $n_j$ differ by 2 and $a_{i,j}=0$ otherwise. Then, the number of positive integers with "m" digits satisfying your properties is the sum of entries of $A^{m-1}$. So you want to find the sum of entries of $A^{999}$. I don't know if this is easy to compute without computers.



    Edit:
    We have $$A=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    0&1&0&0&0\
    1&0&1&0&0\
    0&1&0&1&0\
    0&0&1&0&1\
    0&0&0&1&0\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, thanks to @Mike's comment, it shouldn't be difficult to find the entries of $A^{999}$ we have that $A=PDP^{-1}$ with



    $$D=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&1&0&0\
    0&0&0&-sqrt{3}&0\
    0&0&0&0&sqrt{3}\
    end{array}
    right)$$



    $$P=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&1&-1&1&1\
    1&0&-1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    0&-1&0&2&2\
    -1&0&1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    1&1&1&1&1\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, we can compute $A^{999}=PD^{999}P^{-1}$ whose entries will be a linear combination of $(-1)^{999}, (1)^{999}, (-sqrt{3})^{999},(sqrt{3})^{999}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Define $n_i=2i-1$ (so a bijection between 1,2,3,4,5 with 1,3,5,7,9).
    Consider the 5x5 matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ with $a_{i,j}=1$ if $n_i$ and $n_j$ differ by 2 and $a_{i,j}=0$ otherwise. Then, the number of positive integers with "m" digits satisfying your properties is the sum of entries of $A^{m-1}$. So you want to find the sum of entries of $A^{999}$. I don't know if this is easy to compute without computers.



    Edit:
    We have $$A=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    0&1&0&0&0\
    1&0&1&0&0\
    0&1&0&1&0\
    0&0&1&0&1\
    0&0&0&1&0\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, thanks to @Mike's comment, it shouldn't be difficult to find the entries of $A^{999}$ we have that $A=PDP^{-1}$ with



    $$D=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&0&0&0\
    0&0&1&0&0\
    0&0&0&-sqrt{3}&0\
    0&0&0&0&sqrt{3}\
    end{array}
    right)$$



    $$P=left(begin{array}{ccccc}
    -1&1&-1&1&1\
    1&0&-1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    0&-1&0&2&2\
    -1&0&1&-sqrt{3}&sqrt{3}\
    1&1&1&1&1\
    end{array}
    right)$$

    So, we can compute $A^{999}=PD^{999}P^{-1}$ whose entries will be a linear combination of $(-1)^{999}, (1)^{999}, (-sqrt{3})^{999},(sqrt{3})^{999}$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 3 hours ago









    Julian MejiaJulian Mejia

    64229




    64229








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      3 hours ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
      $endgroup$
      – Mike Earnest
      3 hours ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It shouldn't be too bad to diagonalize $A$. The characteristic polynomial is $lambda^5-4lambda^3+3lambda=lambda(lambda^2-1)(lambda^2-3)$, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    3 hours ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Here is a OCaml program that computes the number of numbers in term of the size of the number:



    type 'a stream= Eos| StrCons of 'a * (unit-> 'a stream)


    let hdStr (s: 'a stream) : 'a =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "headless stream"
    | StrCons (x,_) -> x;;

    let tlStr (s : 'a stream) : 'a stream =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "empty stream"
    | StrCons (x, t) -> t ();;



    let rec listify (s : 'a stream) (n: int) : 'a list =
    if n <= 0 then
    else
    match s with
    | Eos ->
    | _ -> (hdStr s) :: listify (tlStr s) (n - 1);;

    let rec howmanynumber start step=
    if step = 0 then 1 else
    match start with
    |1->howmanynumber 3 (step-1)
    |3->howmanynumber 1 (step-1) + howmanynumber 5 (step-1)
    |5->howmanynumber 3 (step-1) + howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |7->howmanynumber 5 (step-1) + howmanynumber 9 (step-1)
    |9->howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |_->failwith "exception error"



    let count n=
    (howmanynumber 1 n)+(howmanynumber 3 n)+(howmanynumber 5 n)+(howmanynumber 7 n)+(howmanynumber 9 n)

    let rec thisseq n = StrCons(count n , fun ()-> thisseq (n+1))

    let result = thisseq 1


    So Based on @Julian solution, the answer is the sum of entries of



    $begin{bmatrix}
    0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
    0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    end{bmatrix}^{999} * begin{bmatrix}
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    end{bmatrix}$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
      $endgroup$
      – furfur
      4 hours ago
















    1












    $begingroup$

    Here is a OCaml program that computes the number of numbers in term of the size of the number:



    type 'a stream= Eos| StrCons of 'a * (unit-> 'a stream)


    let hdStr (s: 'a stream) : 'a =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "headless stream"
    | StrCons (x,_) -> x;;

    let tlStr (s : 'a stream) : 'a stream =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "empty stream"
    | StrCons (x, t) -> t ();;



    let rec listify (s : 'a stream) (n: int) : 'a list =
    if n <= 0 then
    else
    match s with
    | Eos ->
    | _ -> (hdStr s) :: listify (tlStr s) (n - 1);;

    let rec howmanynumber start step=
    if step = 0 then 1 else
    match start with
    |1->howmanynumber 3 (step-1)
    |3->howmanynumber 1 (step-1) + howmanynumber 5 (step-1)
    |5->howmanynumber 3 (step-1) + howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |7->howmanynumber 5 (step-1) + howmanynumber 9 (step-1)
    |9->howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |_->failwith "exception error"



    let count n=
    (howmanynumber 1 n)+(howmanynumber 3 n)+(howmanynumber 5 n)+(howmanynumber 7 n)+(howmanynumber 9 n)

    let rec thisseq n = StrCons(count n , fun ()-> thisseq (n+1))

    let result = thisseq 1


    So Based on @Julian solution, the answer is the sum of entries of



    $begin{bmatrix}
    0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
    0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    end{bmatrix}^{999} * begin{bmatrix}
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    end{bmatrix}$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
      $endgroup$
      – furfur
      4 hours ago














    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Here is a OCaml program that computes the number of numbers in term of the size of the number:



    type 'a stream= Eos| StrCons of 'a * (unit-> 'a stream)


    let hdStr (s: 'a stream) : 'a =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "headless stream"
    | StrCons (x,_) -> x;;

    let tlStr (s : 'a stream) : 'a stream =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "empty stream"
    | StrCons (x, t) -> t ();;



    let rec listify (s : 'a stream) (n: int) : 'a list =
    if n <= 0 then
    else
    match s with
    | Eos ->
    | _ -> (hdStr s) :: listify (tlStr s) (n - 1);;

    let rec howmanynumber start step=
    if step = 0 then 1 else
    match start with
    |1->howmanynumber 3 (step-1)
    |3->howmanynumber 1 (step-1) + howmanynumber 5 (step-1)
    |5->howmanynumber 3 (step-1) + howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |7->howmanynumber 5 (step-1) + howmanynumber 9 (step-1)
    |9->howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |_->failwith "exception error"



    let count n=
    (howmanynumber 1 n)+(howmanynumber 3 n)+(howmanynumber 5 n)+(howmanynumber 7 n)+(howmanynumber 9 n)

    let rec thisseq n = StrCons(count n , fun ()-> thisseq (n+1))

    let result = thisseq 1


    So Based on @Julian solution, the answer is the sum of entries of



    $begin{bmatrix}
    0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
    0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    end{bmatrix}^{999} * begin{bmatrix}
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    end{bmatrix}$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here is a OCaml program that computes the number of numbers in term of the size of the number:



    type 'a stream= Eos| StrCons of 'a * (unit-> 'a stream)


    let hdStr (s: 'a stream) : 'a =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "headless stream"
    | StrCons (x,_) -> x;;

    let tlStr (s : 'a stream) : 'a stream =
    match s with
    | Eos -> failwith "empty stream"
    | StrCons (x, t) -> t ();;



    let rec listify (s : 'a stream) (n: int) : 'a list =
    if n <= 0 then
    else
    match s with
    | Eos ->
    | _ -> (hdStr s) :: listify (tlStr s) (n - 1);;

    let rec howmanynumber start step=
    if step = 0 then 1 else
    match start with
    |1->howmanynumber 3 (step-1)
    |3->howmanynumber 1 (step-1) + howmanynumber 5 (step-1)
    |5->howmanynumber 3 (step-1) + howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |7->howmanynumber 5 (step-1) + howmanynumber 9 (step-1)
    |9->howmanynumber 7 (step-1)
    |_->failwith "exception error"



    let count n=
    (howmanynumber 1 n)+(howmanynumber 3 n)+(howmanynumber 5 n)+(howmanynumber 7 n)+(howmanynumber 9 n)

    let rec thisseq n = StrCons(count n , fun ()-> thisseq (n+1))

    let result = thisseq 1


    So Based on @Julian solution, the answer is the sum of entries of



    $begin{bmatrix}
    0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \
    0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1\
    0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
    end{bmatrix}^{999} * begin{bmatrix}
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    1 \
    end{bmatrix}$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    mathpadawanmathpadawan

    2,175522




    2,175522












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
      $endgroup$
      – furfur
      4 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
      $endgroup$
      – furfur
      4 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you! But it was supposed to be a mathematical proof, since we are on math.stackexchange. Thank you for your effort though!
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    4 hours ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    The text was too lengthy for a comment and aims on finalizing the previous answers and comments, which boil down to a very simple final answer for $nge2$: $$a_n=begin{cases}hphantom18cdot 3^{frac{n-2}2},& ntext{ even},\14 cdot 3^{frac{n-3}2},& ntext{ odd}.end{cases}tag1$$



    The most simple way to prove $(1)$ is to count directly the number of ways for the cases $n=2,3,4,5$ obtaining $a_n=8,14,24,42$, and then proceed by induction applying the recurrence relation suggested by Mike Earnest on the base of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix introduced by Julian Mejia:
    $$
    a_n=4a_{n-2}-3a_{n-4}.tag2
    $$



    In fact the simplicity of the answer suggests that there is possibly a simpler way to prove $(2)$ or even directly $(1)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The text was too lengthy for a comment and aims on finalizing the previous answers and comments, which boil down to a very simple final answer for $nge2$: $$a_n=begin{cases}hphantom18cdot 3^{frac{n-2}2},& ntext{ even},\14 cdot 3^{frac{n-3}2},& ntext{ odd}.end{cases}tag1$$



      The most simple way to prove $(1)$ is to count directly the number of ways for the cases $n=2,3,4,5$ obtaining $a_n=8,14,24,42$, and then proceed by induction applying the recurrence relation suggested by Mike Earnest on the base of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix introduced by Julian Mejia:
      $$
      a_n=4a_{n-2}-3a_{n-4}.tag2
      $$



      In fact the simplicity of the answer suggests that there is possibly a simpler way to prove $(2)$ or even directly $(1)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The text was too lengthy for a comment and aims on finalizing the previous answers and comments, which boil down to a very simple final answer for $nge2$: $$a_n=begin{cases}hphantom18cdot 3^{frac{n-2}2},& ntext{ even},\14 cdot 3^{frac{n-3}2},& ntext{ odd}.end{cases}tag1$$



        The most simple way to prove $(1)$ is to count directly the number of ways for the cases $n=2,3,4,5$ obtaining $a_n=8,14,24,42$, and then proceed by induction applying the recurrence relation suggested by Mike Earnest on the base of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix introduced by Julian Mejia:
        $$
        a_n=4a_{n-2}-3a_{n-4}.tag2
        $$



        In fact the simplicity of the answer suggests that there is possibly a simpler way to prove $(2)$ or even directly $(1)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The text was too lengthy for a comment and aims on finalizing the previous answers and comments, which boil down to a very simple final answer for $nge2$: $$a_n=begin{cases}hphantom18cdot 3^{frac{n-2}2},& ntext{ even},\14 cdot 3^{frac{n-3}2},& ntext{ odd}.end{cases}tag1$$



        The most simple way to prove $(1)$ is to count directly the number of ways for the cases $n=2,3,4,5$ obtaining $a_n=8,14,24,42$, and then proceed by induction applying the recurrence relation suggested by Mike Earnest on the base of the characteristic polynomial of the matrix introduced by Julian Mejia:
        $$
        a_n=4a_{n-2}-3a_{n-4}.tag2
        $$



        In fact the simplicity of the answer suggests that there is possibly a simpler way to prove $(2)$ or even directly $(1)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 13 mins ago

























        answered 3 hours ago









        useruser

        6,69011031




        6,69011031






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192709%2fcombinatorics-problem-on-counting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Why is a white electrical wire connected to 2 black wires?

            Waikiki

            What are all the squawk codes?