What kind of evidences (if any) could be used to identify a large conquest in the time before writing?












2















From what I understand, writing wasn't completely developed during the Bronze Age. So, if there was an Alexander-the-Great-style conquest that united the known world for a short period of time, what kind of evidence would historians be able to find. Would it even be possible to know of such an event beyond just hearsay?










share|improve this question









New contributor




The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    From what I understand, writing wasn't completely developed during the Bronze Age. So, if there was an Alexander-the-Great-style conquest that united the known world for a short period of time, what kind of evidence would historians be able to find. Would it even be possible to know of such an event beyond just hearsay?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      2












      2








      2








      From what I understand, writing wasn't completely developed during the Bronze Age. So, if there was an Alexander-the-Great-style conquest that united the known world for a short period of time, what kind of evidence would historians be able to find. Would it even be possible to know of such an event beyond just hearsay?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      From what I understand, writing wasn't completely developed during the Bronze Age. So, if there was an Alexander-the-Great-style conquest that united the known world for a short period of time, what kind of evidence would historians be able to find. Would it even be possible to know of such an event beyond just hearsay?







      historiography bronze-age






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Pieter Geerkens

      39.7k6116190




      39.7k6116190






      New contributor




      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      The ZThe Z

      1111




      1111




      New contributor




      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      The Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Diffusion of technology and fashion.



          Some pre-written civilizations are identified by their artifacts, like the Beaker Culture or the Corded Ware Culture. A large-scale conquest would spread the artifacts of the dominant culture widely.



          Timing of large-scale destruction.



          If you look at Troy, there are a number of known destructions with their approximate ages. A large number of destructions in the same time period would be a clue that something drastic happened, but of course it would not prove that there was a single conqueror.



          Genetic markers.



          Archaeogenetics uses genetic tests for historical analysis. Like timing, it can't prove a single conqueror, but it could be combined with the fashion angle -- who was in rich graves?



          But in the end, everything would be up to debate. Imagine that a city was burned down, rebuild, and then a man from far away got buried in a grave with foreign weapons and lots of jewelry. A foreign military governor? A rich merchant? An embittered exile?






          share|improve this answer
























          • Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

            – Pierre Arlaud
            48 secs ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "324"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          The Z is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50901%2fwhat-kind-of-evidences-if-any-could-be-used-to-identify-a-large-conquest-in-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Diffusion of technology and fashion.



          Some pre-written civilizations are identified by their artifacts, like the Beaker Culture or the Corded Ware Culture. A large-scale conquest would spread the artifacts of the dominant culture widely.



          Timing of large-scale destruction.



          If you look at Troy, there are a number of known destructions with their approximate ages. A large number of destructions in the same time period would be a clue that something drastic happened, but of course it would not prove that there was a single conqueror.



          Genetic markers.



          Archaeogenetics uses genetic tests for historical analysis. Like timing, it can't prove a single conqueror, but it could be combined with the fashion angle -- who was in rich graves?



          But in the end, everything would be up to debate. Imagine that a city was burned down, rebuild, and then a man from far away got buried in a grave with foreign weapons and lots of jewelry. A foreign military governor? A rich merchant? An embittered exile?






          share|improve this answer
























          • Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

            – Pierre Arlaud
            48 secs ago
















          4














          Diffusion of technology and fashion.



          Some pre-written civilizations are identified by their artifacts, like the Beaker Culture or the Corded Ware Culture. A large-scale conquest would spread the artifacts of the dominant culture widely.



          Timing of large-scale destruction.



          If you look at Troy, there are a number of known destructions with their approximate ages. A large number of destructions in the same time period would be a clue that something drastic happened, but of course it would not prove that there was a single conqueror.



          Genetic markers.



          Archaeogenetics uses genetic tests for historical analysis. Like timing, it can't prove a single conqueror, but it could be combined with the fashion angle -- who was in rich graves?



          But in the end, everything would be up to debate. Imagine that a city was burned down, rebuild, and then a man from far away got buried in a grave with foreign weapons and lots of jewelry. A foreign military governor? A rich merchant? An embittered exile?






          share|improve this answer
























          • Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

            – Pierre Arlaud
            48 secs ago














          4












          4








          4







          Diffusion of technology and fashion.



          Some pre-written civilizations are identified by their artifacts, like the Beaker Culture or the Corded Ware Culture. A large-scale conquest would spread the artifacts of the dominant culture widely.



          Timing of large-scale destruction.



          If you look at Troy, there are a number of known destructions with their approximate ages. A large number of destructions in the same time period would be a clue that something drastic happened, but of course it would not prove that there was a single conqueror.



          Genetic markers.



          Archaeogenetics uses genetic tests for historical analysis. Like timing, it can't prove a single conqueror, but it could be combined with the fashion angle -- who was in rich graves?



          But in the end, everything would be up to debate. Imagine that a city was burned down, rebuild, and then a man from far away got buried in a grave with foreign weapons and lots of jewelry. A foreign military governor? A rich merchant? An embittered exile?






          share|improve this answer













          Diffusion of technology and fashion.



          Some pre-written civilizations are identified by their artifacts, like the Beaker Culture or the Corded Ware Culture. A large-scale conquest would spread the artifacts of the dominant culture widely.



          Timing of large-scale destruction.



          If you look at Troy, there are a number of known destructions with their approximate ages. A large number of destructions in the same time period would be a clue that something drastic happened, but of course it would not prove that there was a single conqueror.



          Genetic markers.



          Archaeogenetics uses genetic tests for historical analysis. Like timing, it can't prove a single conqueror, but it could be combined with the fashion angle -- who was in rich graves?



          But in the end, everything would be up to debate. Imagine that a city was burned down, rebuild, and then a man from far away got buried in a grave with foreign weapons and lots of jewelry. A foreign military governor? A rich merchant? An embittered exile?







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          o.m.o.m.

          8,8751336




          8,8751336













          • Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

            – Pierre Arlaud
            48 secs ago



















          • Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

            – Pierre Arlaud
            48 secs ago

















          Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

          – Pierre Arlaud
          48 secs ago





          Since you're talking about Troy, I think it's nice mentioning the Iliad was kept through an oral tradition and even though it's mostly fictional it helped find out about Troy and is a convincing argument that the trojan war happened.

          – Pierre Arlaud
          48 secs ago










          The Z is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          The Z is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          The Z is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          The Z is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50901%2fwhat-kind-of-evidences-if-any-could-be-used-to-identify-a-large-conquest-in-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What are all the squawk codes?

          What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

          Hudsonelva