Noun clause (singular all the time?)





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?






grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases







share|improve this question





























    2















    I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
    Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
    - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
    - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



    Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
    Should "are" be "is" then?






    grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases







    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1






      I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
      Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
      - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
      - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



      Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
      Should "are" be "is" then?






      grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases







      share|improve this question














      I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
      Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
      - Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
      - WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



      Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
      Should "are" be "is" then?






      grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases




      grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Fadli SheikhFadli Sheikh

      223




      223






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            50 mins ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            39 mins ago



















          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer
























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            55 mins ago








          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            50 mins ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            50 mins ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            39 mins ago
















          1














          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            50 mins ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            39 mins ago














          1












          1








          1







          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






          share|improve this answer















          Interesting question :)



          I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



          In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 30 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          HannahHannah

          308210




          308210








          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            50 mins ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            39 mins ago














          • 1





            Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

            – John Lawler
            50 mins ago






          • 1





            @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

            – Hannah
            39 mins ago








          1




          1





          Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

          – John Lawler
          50 mins ago





          Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

          – John Lawler
          50 mins ago




          1




          1





          @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

          – Hannah
          39 mins ago





          @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

          – Hannah
          39 mins ago













          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer
























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            55 mins ago








          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            50 mins ago


















          0














          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer
























          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            55 mins ago








          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            50 mins ago
















          0












          0








          0







          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






          share|improve this answer













          It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          Philip WoodPhilip Wood

          4676




          4676













          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            55 mins ago








          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            50 mins ago





















          • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

            – Philip Wood
            1 hour ago











          • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

            – Hannah
            1 hour ago













          • "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

            – Philip Wood
            55 mins ago








          • 1





            'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

            – Philip Wood
            50 mins ago



















          The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago







          The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago















          (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago





          (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

          – Philip Wood
          1 hour ago













          Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago







          Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

          – Hannah
          1 hour ago















          "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

          – Philip Wood
          55 mins ago







          "surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?" Verbs change their form according to whether the subject of the sentence or clause is singular or plural. "scares' and "is" are third person SINGULAR forms, but the subject is plural (two eyes plus one nose!).

          – Philip Wood
          55 mins ago






          1




          1





          'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

          – Philip Wood
          50 mins ago







          'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

          – Philip Wood
          50 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Olav Thon

          Image
          Olav Thon Fødd 29. juni 1923 Ål Yrke forretningsdrivande Olav Thon på Commons Olav Thon (fødd 29. juni 1923) er ein norsk, stort sett sjølvlært forretningsmann, fødd i Ål i Hallingdal, som har gjort store pengar på særleg kjøp, bygging og utvikling av fast eigedom, mellom anna kjøpesentre, hotell og restaurantar, i både Noreg og somme andre land. Han vart Ridder av 1. klasse av St. Olavs Orden i 2003, og er som ivrig friluftsmann æresmedlem i Den Norske Turistforening etter å ha ytt store økonomiske bidrag til foreininga sine hytter og ruter i fjellet. Han er kjend for alltid å gå med ei karakteristisk strikkelue. Olav Thon i samtale med Trond Helleland på sentralbanksjefens årstale i februar 2016 I ung alder reiste Olav Thon til Newcastle for å lære seg engelsk, og han var seinare ei tid i Sveits, der han gjorde forretningar i import og eksport. Deretter tok han til å kjøpe faste eigedomar i Noreg med stor økonomisk suksess, verksemda voks snøgt og v...
          Read more

          Waikiki

          Image
          Denne artikkelen kan ha godt av ein språkvask , som reinskar opp målføringa og/eller innfører same språkstilen overalt. Denne artikkelen kan ha godt av ei opprydding for å nå ein høgare standard og/eller for å verta i tråd med standardoppsettet. Sjå korleis du redigerer ei side og stilmanualen for hjelp. Waikiki Land   USA Stat Hawaii Stad Honolulu Wikimedia Commons: Waikiki Utsyn over Waikiki Waikīkī er ein bydel i Honolulu, sør på øya Oahu, som er ei av Hawaii-øyane. Waikīkīstranda er ein av dei meste berømte strendene i verda. Waikīkī strekkjer seg langs stillehavskysten og har ei rekkje velrenommerte hotell. Bydelen er Hawaii-turismens høyborg. På Waikīkī Beach står ei statue av den lokale sportsstjerna Duka Kahanamoku. Kjelder | Denne artikkelen bygger på «Waikiki» frå Wikipedia på bokmål, den 4. november 2018. Denne artikkelen manglar kjelder eller referansar . Hjelp Wikipedia med å finna truverdige kjelder...
          Read more

          Tårekanal

          Image
          Tåreapparatet ( a ) Tårekjertel ( b ) Øvre tårepunkt ( c ) Øvre tårekanalikkel ( d ) Tåresekk ( e ) Nedre tårepunkt ( f ) Nedre tårekanalikkel ( g ) Tårekanal Tårekanalen eller nase-tårekanalen (av latin ductus nasolacrimalis ) er ein ductus som frakter overflødige tårer frå tåresekken til nasehola. Opninga inn mot nedre nasegang er delvis tildekt av ei ufullstendig slimhinnefold kalla Hasners ventil. Overflødige tårer strøymer gjennom tårekanalen og trekker inn i nedre nasegang. Dette er grunnen til at ein kan få rennande nase når ein gret, og at ein somme gonger kan kjenne saltsmaken av tårer i munnen. Både tårekanalen og tåresekken er tekt med fleirlaga sylinderepitel som inneheld slimproduserande begerceller, og er begge omgjevne av bindevev. Dakryostenose (tårekanalstenose) er ei innsnevring av tårekanalen som fører til epifora, ei overflod av tårer. Medfødd dakryostenose kan føra til cystisk utviding av tårekanalen ved at det dannast ein dakryocystocele. Personar m...
          Read more