Tikz picture of two mathematical functions












1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    6 hours ago
















1















I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    6 hours ago














1












1








1


0






I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica







share|improve this question














I'm trying to draw the functions y=(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2) and x=-0.1/(2*10*(y - 0.1))+y, by using tikz as follows



begin{tikzpicture}

begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$}, ylabel={$s$}]

addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2));

addplot[red,  ultra thick] (-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x,x);

end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}


I obtained the picture:



enter image description here



But I'm not sure about the result (tikz seems to have drawn also the asymptote of second function). For me (and Mathematica) the result should be instead the following:



enter image description here



Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture and my tikz code?






tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica




tikz-pgf wolfram-mathematica






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









MarkMark

20216




20216








  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    6 hours ago














  • 1





    Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

    – marmot
    6 hours ago








1




1





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
6 hours ago





Add appropriate curly brackets: addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)}); addplot[red, ultra thick] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);.

– marmot
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    4 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    4 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    1 hour ago
















6














The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    4 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    1 hour ago














6












6








6







The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















The TikZ/pgfplots parser gets confused about the brackets, it does not know which of them are delimiters of coordinates or expressions in the functions. So you have to help them a bit by adding curly brackets.



documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}

usepackage{pgfplots}

pgfplotsset{compat=1.16}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}

 begin{axis}[xmin=0,xmax=1,ymin=0,ymax=1, samples=1000, xlabel={$c$},

 ylabel={$s$},unbounded coords=discard]

  addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0:0.099] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

  addplot[red,  ultra thick,domain=0.11:1] ({-0.1/(2*10*(x - 0.1))+x},x);

 end{axis}

end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 6 hours ago









marmotmarmot

109k5133252




109k5133252













  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    4 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    1 hour ago



















  • Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

    – Mark
    4 hours ago











  • @Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

    – marmot
    1 hour ago

















Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
4 hours ago





Thank you! It's clear. Is there a way to remove the asymptote?

– Mark
4 hours ago













@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
1 hour ago





@Mark Sure. (Sorry, was offline.) I removed the red asymptote. If you want to remove the blue one as well, remove addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,{(0.05*0.4+0.1*2*x)/(0.05+0.1*2)});. The red one was because you plotted over a singularity at x=0.1, and one easy way to remove it is to add two separate plots that avoid it.

– marmot
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479823%2ftikz-picture-of-two-mathematical-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Olav Thon

Image
Olav Thon Fødd 29. juni 1923 Ål Yrke forretningsdrivande Olav Thon på Commons Olav Thon (fødd 29. juni 1923) er ein norsk, stort sett sjølvlært forretningsmann, fødd i Ål i Hallingdal, som har gjort store pengar på særleg kjøp, bygging og utvikling av fast eigedom, mellom anna kjøpesentre, hotell og restaurantar, i både Noreg og somme andre land. Han vart Ridder av 1. klasse av St. Olavs Orden i 2003, og er som ivrig friluftsmann æresmedlem i Den Norske Turistforening etter å ha ytt store økonomiske bidrag til foreininga sine hytter og ruter i fjellet. Han er kjend for alltid å gå med ei karakteristisk strikkelue. Olav Thon i samtale med Trond Helleland på sentralbanksjefens årstale i februar 2016 I ung alder reiste Olav Thon til Newcastle for å lære seg engelsk, og han var seinare ei tid i Sveits, der han gjorde forretningar i import og eksport. Deretter tok han til å kjøpe faste eigedomar i Noreg med stor økonomisk suksess, verksemda voks snøgt og v
Read more

Waikiki

Image
Denne artikkelen kan ha godt av ein språkvask , som reinskar opp målføringa og/eller innfører same språkstilen overalt. Denne artikkelen kan ha godt av ei opprydding for å nå ein høgare standard og/eller for å verta i tråd med standardoppsettet. Sjå korleis du redigerer ei side og stilmanualen for hjelp. Waikiki Land   USA Stat Hawaii Stad Honolulu Wikimedia Commons: Waikiki Utsyn over Waikiki Waikīkī er ein bydel i Honolulu, sør på øya Oahu, som er ei av Hawaii-øyane. Waikīkīstranda er ein av dei meste berømte strendene i verda. Waikīkī strekkjer seg langs stillehavskysten og har ei rekkje velrenommerte hotell. Bydelen er Hawaii-turismens høyborg. På Waikīkī Beach står ei statue av den lokale sportsstjerna Duka Kahanamoku. Kjelder | Denne artikkelen bygger på «Waikiki» frå Wikipedia på bokmål, den 4. november 2018. Denne artikkelen manglar kjelder eller referansar . Hjelp Wikipedia med å finna truverdige kjelder
Read more

Hudsonelva

Image
Hudson elv Land   USA Område New York Sideelvar Mohawk Lengd 507 km Middelvassføring 606 m³/s Munning Upper New York Bay i Atlanterhavet Elvene Hudson og Mohawk med nedbørsområdet markert med gult. Wikimedia Commons: Hudson River Hudsonelva ( Hudson River ) mohikansk Muh-he-kun-ne-tuk ) er ei elv i USA. Ho renn hovudsakleg gjennom delstaten New York, men markerer også ein del av grensa mellom New York og New Jersey. Hudsonelva har namn etter Henry Hudson, ein engelskmann som utforska elva i 1609. Hudsonelva sett frå Bear Mountain Bridge. Kjelda til elva er Tear-of-the-Clouds-sjøen i Adirondackfjella. Ved Albany renn Mohawk-elva saman med henne, og deretter renn ho nesten rett sørover til ho munnar ut i Atlanterhavet mellom Manhattan i New York og New Jersey. Eriekanalen, som blei opna den 26 oktober 1825, bind saman Hudsonelva og Eriesjøen, slik at byane ved Dei store sjøane fekk vasstilgang til A
Read more