What kind of parity is this? (5x5)
$begingroup$
I was just solving my 5x5 cube as always, but at the end I got this configuration and haven't found anything regarding this kind of parity. I am pretty sure all squares are correctly placed and no twists are there.
Before I got the edge parity in 5x5, then I used my 4x4 parity algorithm taking 1-2 as left and right sides respectively. This was the result. I am pretty much confused to how this happened?
The configuration is:
whole solved except middle edges on O-Y, Y-R, R-W are y-r, w-r, o-w respectively with r-r-y on top(rotating ccw).
Images are included for reference.
rubiks-cube
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was just solving my 5x5 cube as always, but at the end I got this configuration and haven't found anything regarding this kind of parity. I am pretty sure all squares are correctly placed and no twists are there.
Before I got the edge parity in 5x5, then I used my 4x4 parity algorithm taking 1-2 as left and right sides respectively. This was the result. I am pretty much confused to how this happened?
The configuration is:
whole solved except middle edges on O-Y, Y-R, R-W are y-r, w-r, o-w respectively with r-r-y on top(rotating ccw).
Images are included for reference.
rubiks-cube
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was just solving my 5x5 cube as always, but at the end I got this configuration and haven't found anything regarding this kind of parity. I am pretty sure all squares are correctly placed and no twists are there.
Before I got the edge parity in 5x5, then I used my 4x4 parity algorithm taking 1-2 as left and right sides respectively. This was the result. I am pretty much confused to how this happened?
The configuration is:
whole solved except middle edges on O-Y, Y-R, R-W are y-r, w-r, o-w respectively with r-r-y on top(rotating ccw).
Images are included for reference.
rubiks-cube
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I was just solving my 5x5 cube as always, but at the end I got this configuration and haven't found anything regarding this kind of parity. I am pretty sure all squares are correctly placed and no twists are there.
Before I got the edge parity in 5x5, then I used my 4x4 parity algorithm taking 1-2 as left and right sides respectively. This was the result. I am pretty much confused to how this happened?
The configuration is:
whole solved except middle edges on O-Y, Y-R, R-W are y-r, w-r, o-w respectively with r-r-y on top(rotating ccw).
Images are included for reference.
rubiks-cube
rubiks-cube
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
asked 6 mins ago
K_lash96K_lash96
1
1
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
K_lash96 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
K_lash96 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83289%2fwhat-kind-of-parity-is-this-5x5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
K_lash96 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K_lash96 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K_lash96 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K_lash96 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83289%2fwhat-kind-of-parity-is-this-5x5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
