How can a school be getting an epidemic of whooping cough if most of the students are vaccinated?












1















Apparently a private school is experiencing an outbreak of whooping cough. However, the article said that only 18 of the students in the school (out of 1500 or so) were unvaccinated, yet already 30 have the disease. Presumably some of the infected students were vaccinated. How can this be?










share|improve this question























  • related

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago
















1















Apparently a private school is experiencing an outbreak of whooping cough. However, the article said that only 18 of the students in the school (out of 1500 or so) were unvaccinated, yet already 30 have the disease. Presumably some of the infected students were vaccinated. How can this be?










share|improve this question























  • related

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago














1












1








1


1






Apparently a private school is experiencing an outbreak of whooping cough. However, the article said that only 18 of the students in the school (out of 1500 or so) were unvaccinated, yet already 30 have the disease. Presumably some of the infected students were vaccinated. How can this be?










share|improve this question














Apparently a private school is experiencing an outbreak of whooping cough. However, the article said that only 18 of the students in the school (out of 1500 or so) were unvaccinated, yet already 30 have the disease. Presumably some of the infected students were vaccinated. How can this be?







vaccination whooping-cough epidemic






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









Tyler DurdenTyler Durden

18418




18418













  • related

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago



















  • related

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago

















related

– De Novo
2 hours ago





related

– De Novo
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Per the CDC:




A: Pertussis vaccines are effective, but not perfect. They typically
offer good levels of protection within the first 2 years after getting
the vaccine, but then protection decreases over time. Public health
experts call this ‘waning immunity.’ Similarly, natural infection may
also only protect you for a few years.



In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get
all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the
year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully
protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each
following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years
after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids
are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.



CDC’s current estimate is that in the first year after getting
vaccinated with Tdap, it protects about 7 out of 10 people who receive
it. There is a decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About
3 or 4 out of 10 people are fully protected 4 years after getting
Tdap.



Keeping up-to-date with recommended pertussis vaccines is the best way
to protect you and your loved ones.




Given the size of the school and the effectiveness of the vaccine, it appears that ~30 infected kids is within what's expected.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago











  • @DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

    – ShadowRanger
    12 mins ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "607"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmedicalsciences.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f18733%2fhow-can-a-school-be-getting-an-epidemic-of-whooping-cough-if-most-of-the-student%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Per the CDC:




A: Pertussis vaccines are effective, but not perfect. They typically
offer good levels of protection within the first 2 years after getting
the vaccine, but then protection decreases over time. Public health
experts call this ‘waning immunity.’ Similarly, natural infection may
also only protect you for a few years.



In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get
all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the
year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully
protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each
following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years
after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids
are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.



CDC’s current estimate is that in the first year after getting
vaccinated with Tdap, it protects about 7 out of 10 people who receive
it. There is a decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About
3 or 4 out of 10 people are fully protected 4 years after getting
Tdap.



Keeping up-to-date with recommended pertussis vaccines is the best way
to protect you and your loved ones.




Given the size of the school and the effectiveness of the vaccine, it appears that ~30 infected kids is within what's expected.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago











  • @DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

    – ShadowRanger
    12 mins ago


















3














Per the CDC:




A: Pertussis vaccines are effective, but not perfect. They typically
offer good levels of protection within the first 2 years after getting
the vaccine, but then protection decreases over time. Public health
experts call this ‘waning immunity.’ Similarly, natural infection may
also only protect you for a few years.



In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get
all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the
year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully
protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each
following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years
after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids
are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.



CDC’s current estimate is that in the first year after getting
vaccinated with Tdap, it protects about 7 out of 10 people who receive
it. There is a decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About
3 or 4 out of 10 people are fully protected 4 years after getting
Tdap.



Keeping up-to-date with recommended pertussis vaccines is the best way
to protect you and your loved ones.




Given the size of the school and the effectiveness of the vaccine, it appears that ~30 infected kids is within what's expected.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago











  • @DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

    – ShadowRanger
    12 mins ago
















3












3








3







Per the CDC:




A: Pertussis vaccines are effective, but not perfect. They typically
offer good levels of protection within the first 2 years after getting
the vaccine, but then protection decreases over time. Public health
experts call this ‘waning immunity.’ Similarly, natural infection may
also only protect you for a few years.



In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get
all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the
year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully
protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each
following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years
after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids
are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.



CDC’s current estimate is that in the first year after getting
vaccinated with Tdap, it protects about 7 out of 10 people who receive
it. There is a decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About
3 or 4 out of 10 people are fully protected 4 years after getting
Tdap.



Keeping up-to-date with recommended pertussis vaccines is the best way
to protect you and your loved ones.




Given the size of the school and the effectiveness of the vaccine, it appears that ~30 infected kids is within what's expected.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










Per the CDC:




A: Pertussis vaccines are effective, but not perfect. They typically
offer good levels of protection within the first 2 years after getting
the vaccine, but then protection decreases over time. Public health
experts call this ‘waning immunity.’ Similarly, natural infection may
also only protect you for a few years.



In general, DTaP vaccines are 80% to 90% effective. Among kids who get
all 5 doses of DTaP on schedule, effectiveness is very high within the
year following the 5th dose – at least 9 out of 10 kids are fully
protected. There is a modest decrease in effectiveness in each
following year. About 7 out of 10 kids are fully protected 5 years
after getting their last dose of DTaP and the other 3 out of 10 kids
are partially protected – protecting against serious disease.



CDC’s current estimate is that in the first year after getting
vaccinated with Tdap, it protects about 7 out of 10 people who receive
it. There is a decrease in effectiveness in each following year. About
3 or 4 out of 10 people are fully protected 4 years after getting
Tdap.



Keeping up-to-date with recommended pertussis vaccines is the best way
to protect you and your loved ones.




Given the size of the school and the effectiveness of the vaccine, it appears that ~30 infected kids is within what's expected.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 4 hours ago









ventsyvventsyv

1311




1311




New contributor




ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






ventsyv is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago











  • @DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

    – ShadowRanger
    12 mins ago





















  • Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

    – De Novo
    2 hours ago











  • @DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

    – ShadowRanger
    12 mins ago



















Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

– De Novo
2 hours ago





Yes, outbreaks of this sort typically start with an unvaccinated index case and are able to spread because of the population of susceptible individuals, but end up infecting some vaccinated children. See my answer on Biology.SE, which discusses other outbreaks since 2000.

– De Novo
2 hours ago













@DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

– ShadowRanger
12 mins ago







@DeNovo: That said, pertussis/whooping cough seems to be an unusually bad case. The vaccine was adjusted for reduced side-effects (from whole cell to acellular) a couple decades ago, and the new version has lower efficacy, and it wanes rapidly.

– ShadowRanger
12 mins ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Medical Sciences Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmedicalsciences.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f18733%2fhow-can-a-school-be-getting-an-epidemic-of-whooping-cough-if-most-of-the-student%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What are all the squawk codes?

What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

Hudsonelva