What can I do with a property that won't sell following divorce?












29















My wife and I bought a property just over 2 years ago for €114,000.



We put down a 10% deposit (€11,400) and so took out a mortgage of €102,600.



We took the mortgage on a short term (15 years) to pay off capital as quickly as possible. The mortgage balance is now down to €89,000.



So, based on the price for which we purchased the property, we have around €25,000 of equity available should we sell at the same price.



We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.



My wife has been contributing to the mortgage since we separated, even though she doesn't live there. This is so that she can receive an equal share when the house sells (it was 5 year fixed rate). She is now telling me that she cannot afford to continue doing this. She has asked that I 'buy her out', by giving her half of the equity (around 12,500) and in return, she will sign over her half to me.



My issue(s) with this:




  • I have around 20k in the bank. This will drastically reduce that to less than 8.

  • What if the house sells for less than we paid? It's not looking promising right now.

  • What if the house takes years to sell? I will not be able to access that capital, meanwhile I'm paying twice as much each month towards the mortgage. (And stuck living in a location I don't want to be in anymore).


What are my options in this situation? I'm looking for something that will not put me in financial difficulty, whilst still being fair to and helping my ex-wife, whom I still care for.










share|improve this question




















  • 8





    Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

    – Mołot
    2 days ago








  • 21





    You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

    – JBentley
    yesterday






  • 6





    @JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

    – Harper
    yesterday








  • 15





    @Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

    – CactusCake
    yesterday








  • 8





    @Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

    – JBentley
    yesterday


















29















My wife and I bought a property just over 2 years ago for €114,000.



We put down a 10% deposit (€11,400) and so took out a mortgage of €102,600.



We took the mortgage on a short term (15 years) to pay off capital as quickly as possible. The mortgage balance is now down to €89,000.



So, based on the price for which we purchased the property, we have around €25,000 of equity available should we sell at the same price.



We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.



My wife has been contributing to the mortgage since we separated, even though she doesn't live there. This is so that she can receive an equal share when the house sells (it was 5 year fixed rate). She is now telling me that she cannot afford to continue doing this. She has asked that I 'buy her out', by giving her half of the equity (around 12,500) and in return, she will sign over her half to me.



My issue(s) with this:




  • I have around 20k in the bank. This will drastically reduce that to less than 8.

  • What if the house sells for less than we paid? It's not looking promising right now.

  • What if the house takes years to sell? I will not be able to access that capital, meanwhile I'm paying twice as much each month towards the mortgage. (And stuck living in a location I don't want to be in anymore).


What are my options in this situation? I'm looking for something that will not put me in financial difficulty, whilst still being fair to and helping my ex-wife, whom I still care for.










share|improve this question




















  • 8





    Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

    – Mołot
    2 days ago








  • 21





    You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

    – JBentley
    yesterday






  • 6





    @JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

    – Harper
    yesterday








  • 15





    @Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

    – CactusCake
    yesterday








  • 8





    @Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

    – JBentley
    yesterday
















29












29








29


3






My wife and I bought a property just over 2 years ago for €114,000.



We put down a 10% deposit (€11,400) and so took out a mortgage of €102,600.



We took the mortgage on a short term (15 years) to pay off capital as quickly as possible. The mortgage balance is now down to €89,000.



So, based on the price for which we purchased the property, we have around €25,000 of equity available should we sell at the same price.



We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.



My wife has been contributing to the mortgage since we separated, even though she doesn't live there. This is so that she can receive an equal share when the house sells (it was 5 year fixed rate). She is now telling me that she cannot afford to continue doing this. She has asked that I 'buy her out', by giving her half of the equity (around 12,500) and in return, she will sign over her half to me.



My issue(s) with this:




  • I have around 20k in the bank. This will drastically reduce that to less than 8.

  • What if the house sells for less than we paid? It's not looking promising right now.

  • What if the house takes years to sell? I will not be able to access that capital, meanwhile I'm paying twice as much each month towards the mortgage. (And stuck living in a location I don't want to be in anymore).


What are my options in this situation? I'm looking for something that will not put me in financial difficulty, whilst still being fair to and helping my ex-wife, whom I still care for.










share|improve this question
















My wife and I bought a property just over 2 years ago for €114,000.



We put down a 10% deposit (€11,400) and so took out a mortgage of €102,600.



We took the mortgage on a short term (15 years) to pay off capital as quickly as possible. The mortgage balance is now down to €89,000.



So, based on the price for which we purchased the property, we have around €25,000 of equity available should we sell at the same price.



We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.



My wife has been contributing to the mortgage since we separated, even though she doesn't live there. This is so that she can receive an equal share when the house sells (it was 5 year fixed rate). She is now telling me that she cannot afford to continue doing this. She has asked that I 'buy her out', by giving her half of the equity (around 12,500) and in return, she will sign over her half to me.



My issue(s) with this:




  • I have around 20k in the bank. This will drastically reduce that to less than 8.

  • What if the house sells for less than we paid? It's not looking promising right now.

  • What if the house takes years to sell? I will not be able to access that capital, meanwhile I'm paying twice as much each month towards the mortgage. (And stuck living in a location I don't want to be in anymore).


What are my options in this situation? I'm looking for something that will not put me in financial difficulty, whilst still being fair to and helping my ex-wife, whom I still care for.







united-kingdom real-estate savings divorce






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









costrom

12015




12015










asked 2 days ago









CloudCloud

1,6754718




1,6754718








  • 8





    Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

    – Mołot
    2 days ago








  • 21





    You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

    – JBentley
    yesterday






  • 6





    @JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

    – Harper
    yesterday








  • 15





    @Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

    – CactusCake
    yesterday








  • 8





    @Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

    – JBentley
    yesterday
















  • 8





    Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

    – Mołot
    2 days ago








  • 21





    You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

    – JBentley
    yesterday






  • 6





    @JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

    – Harper
    yesterday








  • 15





    @Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

    – CactusCake
    yesterday








  • 8





    @Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

    – JBentley
    yesterday










8




8





Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

– Mołot
2 days ago







Do you want to sell, or would you consider living there if you would pay her up? "What if the house sells for less than we paid?" - why do you feel you need to ask that? Isn't it quite obvious what will happen if you will pay the price so high no one is even looking at the house now?..

– Mołot
2 days ago






21




21





You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

– JBentley
yesterday





You have tagged this question united-kingdom, but your question refers to figures in euros (€) which the UK does not use. Please can you clarify and amend the question accordingly.

– JBentley
yesterday




6




6





@JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

– Harper
yesterday







@JBentley who cares how the funds are denominated? If OP uses bitcoin, or quatloos, doesn't change the Q or A.

– Harper
yesterday






15




15





@Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

– CactusCake
yesterday







@Harper I think JBentley is more interested in clarifying the location than the currency. Housing market prospects in other € nations might be different than the UK at present, it might affect the What if the house takes years to sell part of the question perhaps. I don't know.

– CactusCake
yesterday






8




8





@Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

– JBentley
yesterday







@Harper As per the above comment, my point is in reference to the UK tag, not any concern about the currency. I was prompted to make the comment because one of the answers makes reference to the US vs. the UK, and it seems likely that the location is not in fact the UK. The currency is simply the clue to the fact that the tag might be wrong.

– JBentley
yesterday












8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes


















34














To actually answer your (financial) question:



What are my options in this situation?



A. Rent out the property share the profit / remaining costs while building equity until you find a buyer.



B. Lower the asking price. You may have to sell it at a loss. Too late to complain now. As they say, you make the money in buying. Looks like you bought too high. Split profit or worst case the loss.



C. Keep the house, buy out your ex. Either give her what she asks or, what´s done in other cases where the real market price is unclear: Find another buyer, while you get pre-emption right to buy at that price. This could also go the other way 'round, if she´d be willing to buy you out.



Also: It´s sounding like you live in the house, but you share the mortgage. Normally, shouldn't you have to pay her (half) the typical rent as long as you live there and did not buy her out?






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

    – Nij
    yesterday






  • 11





    @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

    – Daniel
    yesterday






  • 3





    He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

    – Nij
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

    – Ben
    23 hours ago








  • 4





    @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

    – GrandOpener
    21 hours ago



















37














Depending upon the divorce laws in your jurisdiction she could be entitle to 50% of the proceeds of the property sale no matter if she contributes to the payment or not. In some sense she may be doing you a big favor by contributing half. You may want to seek a lawyer's advice on all this because it is so jurisdiction dependent.



Typically there are closing costs when selling a property. Here in the US, even if you got the asking price, the property would yield about €7-10K. So each party would be entitled to between €3.5-5K. If applicable closing costs need to be factored into the transaction. I am having difficulty finding this information that is UK related for the seller.



Whatever you can do, it behooves you to work with your estranged spouse. Will she take a bit less than what she is owed? Even if it partially depletes your savings, it might be worth it. If she takes you to court to force the sale, those costs can wipe out your savings and yield nothing. By buying her out, you at least have a property on the asset sheet, where paying a lawyer is nothing but an expense.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3





    The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

    – JBentley
    yesterday






  • 4





    Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

    – Joshua
    yesterday






  • 1





    This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

    – Dancrumb
    yesterday






  • 1





    Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

    – Richard Tingle
    yesterday






  • 1





    Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

    – RobV
    yesterday



















19














Anecdote: My grandparents gifted me and my girlfriend £30k so that we
could buy our first house together, and I contributed a further £3k
towards the deposit for a better mortgage rate. Over the next two
years, I paid for the bathroom to be re-done at £7.5k, as well as the
windows and doors for £2.5k, so the house went from being worth £210k
to £250k... and then we broke up. She had contributed 50% to all the
mortgage payments, and was entitled to 50% of the house - it cost me a
further £20k to 'buy her out'.



It was a lot of money to scrape together... but I ended up with a
property and she went back to moving around and renting for a couple
of years, so actually wound up a little worse off than myself - even
after a £20k payment.



In the grand scheme of things; 12,500 is a drop in the ocean. Having somewhere to live is better than nothing, and you'll still have a decent amount of savings behind you.



I appreciate you no longer want to be in that particular location, and we can't tell you what to do, but whilst the house isn't selling and your ex-wife is offering you an out... I would take it.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

    – vikingsteve
    6 hours ago



















9














I am answering from the perspective of:




We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.




I would suggest you reach out to the estate agent (I'm assuming you have "conventionally" put it on the market rather than one of those 'sell your own house through our portal' outfits) to find out what the situation is there -- have they had any feedback from potential viewers, why don't they think it is getting any "bites"? Presumably they want to get their commission..?! Is it on 'Rightmove' and things like that. Maybe they are just rubbish.. What are their terms for moving to another agent? Is there anything obviously wrong with the house (e.g. it's in such a state of disrepair that it's "unmortgageable")?



You can sell any property (within reason!) if you are prepared to compromise on price. If you haven't had even a single viewing it sounds like there is something you need to remedy with the listing / the price / the agent before looking at other options.



Personally (I have a fairly high risk-tolerant attitude) I would buy her out (as part of a divorce agreement) on that basis, if I had reasonably stable job prospects (current employer / could find another) in your situation. Make sure you consult a good lawyer to see that the paperwork is done properly with "signing over" the deeds.



Btw: It isn't clear whether she has "officially" asked (via the divorce procedure) or just unofficially, for you to buy her out. It sounds like you are on amicable terms so I would suggest you agree between yourselves and then get it officially recorded as part of the financial arrangements of the divorce. If you can agree it yourselves first rather than everything going through solicitors, both of your legal bills will be much lower! :)



Source: went through something similar myself 18 months ago.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    5














    UK property market is in limbo right now; nobody is buying or selling unless they have to due to the uncertainties of brexit. This has been the case for half a year or so, but is getting really bad right now according to estate agents I know. Autumn and winter are also bad times to sell properties anyway.



    If you and your wife (and your divorce lawyers) were amenable to waiting for a while, the situation is likely to improve with regard to getting viewings and being able to sell the property. Take it off the market now, and put it back on the market in early Summer. (this assumes that Brexit is resolved by then, of course, but even if not, summer is always better for selling houses)



    If you cannot wait, then the you have the option of selling the house by auction. This typically brings in a lower valuation than a normal sale, and the amount you'll get for the house is by no means certain, but it is a way of guaranteeing a sale (though pragmatically, you will likely want to put a reserve price on the auction to avoid selling for less than you can afford).






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

      – Cloud
      4 hours ago



















    4














    I purchased a home Florida many years ago for 165,000. I subsequently took a job in New York and had to put the house up for sale. I listed the house for what I paid for it, 165K. after a couple of monhts my CFO asked me if the house has sold. I told him no because people were not offering what the house was worth. He corrected me by saying "The house is worth what the market is willing to pay"



    This is a tough lesson but a true one. Regardless of the marital situation, your asset is worth what the market will pay. I recommend you list the home at a price that will sell, take your loss and then go live where you want to live. Holding on to an asset you do not want to own simply makes no logical sense.



    I suggest move on and be happy. 10 years from now you will not miss a few thousand euros.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

      – Cloud
      4 hours ago











    • Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

      – Oscar Bravo
      4 hours ago



















    2














    Buy her out as part of the property settlement and only as part of the property settlement.



    Don't, whatever you do, is buy her out without a property settlement. Nobody cares who's name is on the property when it comes to settlement so you'd be just funding her legal fight against you at the cost of being able to defend yourself and she'll still take half the house.



    Even though she isn't living there, she still has to pay half the mortgage as it's her name on the loan. Everything she has to spend now is less she can spend on lawyers.



    Whilst you're in a position of power (more or less), negotiate like hell and try your best to settle out of court. Do everything you can to avoid court because lawyers will take the lot.



    My ex never gave me any choice and used the court system to hurt me. I spent four years fighting and the only winners were the lawyers.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




























      1














      I can't speak for any of the legal matters, such as what she's entitled to due to divorce, what kind of legal agreement you need, etc, but there's something else you might want to consider: if she wants you to buy her out, she's asking you to assume all the risk afterwards. Even if you're on good terms, it makes no sense for her to get 50% of any profit by sandbagging you with a property that obviously won't rent or won't sell and that could sink much lower. If she can't or isn't willing to stick around and ride out the risk, she shouldn't be entitled to an equal payout, even at its current value. I understand that you don't want to be mean about it and that you still care about her, but if she really wants what's best for you, she can't take half the equity and then leave you with a risk like that. Try to negotiate buying her out for less than 50%.






      share|improve this answer
























      • This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

        – Cloud
        4 hours ago






      • 1





        @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

        – CMB
        4 hours ago






      • 1





        @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

        – CMB
        4 hours ago



















      8 Answers
      8






      active

      oldest

      votes








      8 Answers
      8






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      34














      To actually answer your (financial) question:



      What are my options in this situation?



      A. Rent out the property share the profit / remaining costs while building equity until you find a buyer.



      B. Lower the asking price. You may have to sell it at a loss. Too late to complain now. As they say, you make the money in buying. Looks like you bought too high. Split profit or worst case the loss.



      C. Keep the house, buy out your ex. Either give her what she asks or, what´s done in other cases where the real market price is unclear: Find another buyer, while you get pre-emption right to buy at that price. This could also go the other way 'round, if she´d be willing to buy you out.



      Also: It´s sounding like you live in the house, but you share the mortgage. Normally, shouldn't you have to pay her (half) the typical rent as long as you live there and did not buy her out?






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 11





        @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

        – Daniel
        yesterday






      • 3





        He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 4





        @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

        – Ben
        23 hours ago








      • 4





        @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

        – GrandOpener
        21 hours ago
















      34














      To actually answer your (financial) question:



      What are my options in this situation?



      A. Rent out the property share the profit / remaining costs while building equity until you find a buyer.



      B. Lower the asking price. You may have to sell it at a loss. Too late to complain now. As they say, you make the money in buying. Looks like you bought too high. Split profit or worst case the loss.



      C. Keep the house, buy out your ex. Either give her what she asks or, what´s done in other cases where the real market price is unclear: Find another buyer, while you get pre-emption right to buy at that price. This could also go the other way 'round, if she´d be willing to buy you out.



      Also: It´s sounding like you live in the house, but you share the mortgage. Normally, shouldn't you have to pay her (half) the typical rent as long as you live there and did not buy her out?






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 11





        @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

        – Daniel
        yesterday






      • 3





        He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 4





        @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

        – Ben
        23 hours ago








      • 4





        @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

        – GrandOpener
        21 hours ago














      34












      34








      34







      To actually answer your (financial) question:



      What are my options in this situation?



      A. Rent out the property share the profit / remaining costs while building equity until you find a buyer.



      B. Lower the asking price. You may have to sell it at a loss. Too late to complain now. As they say, you make the money in buying. Looks like you bought too high. Split profit or worst case the loss.



      C. Keep the house, buy out your ex. Either give her what she asks or, what´s done in other cases where the real market price is unclear: Find another buyer, while you get pre-emption right to buy at that price. This could also go the other way 'round, if she´d be willing to buy you out.



      Also: It´s sounding like you live in the house, but you share the mortgage. Normally, shouldn't you have to pay her (half) the typical rent as long as you live there and did not buy her out?






      share|improve this answer















      To actually answer your (financial) question:



      What are my options in this situation?



      A. Rent out the property share the profit / remaining costs while building equity until you find a buyer.



      B. Lower the asking price. You may have to sell it at a loss. Too late to complain now. As they say, you make the money in buying. Looks like you bought too high. Split profit or worst case the loss.



      C. Keep the house, buy out your ex. Either give her what she asks or, what´s done in other cases where the real market price is unclear: Find another buyer, while you get pre-emption right to buy at that price. This could also go the other way 'round, if she´d be willing to buy you out.



      Also: It´s sounding like you live in the house, but you share the mortgage. Normally, shouldn't you have to pay her (half) the typical rent as long as you live there and did not buy her out?







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 23 hours ago









      Malandy

      1094




      1094










      answered yesterday









      DanielDaniel

      3,82211016




      3,82211016








      • 4





        Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 11





        @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

        – Daniel
        yesterday






      • 3





        He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 4





        @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

        – Ben
        23 hours ago








      • 4





        @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

        – GrandOpener
        21 hours ago














      • 4





        Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 11





        @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

        – Daniel
        yesterday






      • 3





        He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

        – Nij
        yesterday






      • 4





        @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

        – Ben
        23 hours ago








      • 4





        @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

        – GrandOpener
        21 hours ago








      4




      4





      Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

      – Nij
      yesterday





      Owners have the right to use their own property, subject to contracts varying. Whether they exercise that right or not doesn't affect whether any other owner can or can't, and doesn't apply any condition to it. Paying someone else rent for living in a house that you yourself are paying the mortgage for? Why would that be normal or typical in any sense?

      – Nij
      yesterday




      11




      11





      @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

      – Daniel
      yesterday





      @Nij: He owns half of the house and pays half of the mortgage. If he uses the whole house, he´d pay rent for the half he does not own.

      – Daniel
      yesterday




      3




      3





      He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

      – Nij
      yesterday





      He owns half the equity in the house, that's not at all the same as owning half the house, and neither of those has any relevance to what absolute parts or relative proportion he can or can't use.

      – Nij
      yesterday




      4




      4





      @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

      – Ben
      23 hours ago







      @Nij he doesn't "own half the equity in the house" or "half the house" he owns all of the house, probably jointly and severally with his wife, and he has a mortgage secured on it, probably jointly and severally with his wife. He can use it, he does not have to ask permission, and so can she, and neither does she. If only one of them uses it the other may have a claim in equity.

      – Ben
      23 hours ago






      4




      4





      @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

      – GrandOpener
      21 hours ago





      @Daniel I'm not a lawyer, but having read a bit about tenancy rights, it's my understanding that in the majority of cases jointly owning a house entitles both owners to the use of the entire house. Absent another agreement, the husband should be able to use the entire house without owing anything to the wife, but he also cannot legally prevent her from coming back and using it herself, nor can he modify it without her permission.

      – GrandOpener
      21 hours ago













      37














      Depending upon the divorce laws in your jurisdiction she could be entitle to 50% of the proceeds of the property sale no matter if she contributes to the payment or not. In some sense she may be doing you a big favor by contributing half. You may want to seek a lawyer's advice on all this because it is so jurisdiction dependent.



      Typically there are closing costs when selling a property. Here in the US, even if you got the asking price, the property would yield about €7-10K. So each party would be entitled to between €3.5-5K. If applicable closing costs need to be factored into the transaction. I am having difficulty finding this information that is UK related for the seller.



      Whatever you can do, it behooves you to work with your estranged spouse. Will she take a bit less than what she is owed? Even if it partially depletes your savings, it might be worth it. If she takes you to court to force the sale, those costs can wipe out your savings and yield nothing. By buying her out, you at least have a property on the asset sheet, where paying a lawyer is nothing but an expense.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 3





        The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

        – JBentley
        yesterday






      • 4





        Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

        – Joshua
        yesterday






      • 1





        This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

        – Dancrumb
        yesterday






      • 1





        Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

        – Richard Tingle
        yesterday






      • 1





        Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

        – RobV
        yesterday
















      37














      Depending upon the divorce laws in your jurisdiction she could be entitle to 50% of the proceeds of the property sale no matter if she contributes to the payment or not. In some sense she may be doing you a big favor by contributing half. You may want to seek a lawyer's advice on all this because it is so jurisdiction dependent.



      Typically there are closing costs when selling a property. Here in the US, even if you got the asking price, the property would yield about €7-10K. So each party would be entitled to between €3.5-5K. If applicable closing costs need to be factored into the transaction. I am having difficulty finding this information that is UK related for the seller.



      Whatever you can do, it behooves you to work with your estranged spouse. Will she take a bit less than what she is owed? Even if it partially depletes your savings, it might be worth it. If she takes you to court to force the sale, those costs can wipe out your savings and yield nothing. By buying her out, you at least have a property on the asset sheet, where paying a lawyer is nothing but an expense.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 3





        The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

        – JBentley
        yesterday






      • 4





        Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

        – Joshua
        yesterday






      • 1





        This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

        – Dancrumb
        yesterday






      • 1





        Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

        – Richard Tingle
        yesterday






      • 1





        Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

        – RobV
        yesterday














      37












      37








      37







      Depending upon the divorce laws in your jurisdiction she could be entitle to 50% of the proceeds of the property sale no matter if she contributes to the payment or not. In some sense she may be doing you a big favor by contributing half. You may want to seek a lawyer's advice on all this because it is so jurisdiction dependent.



      Typically there are closing costs when selling a property. Here in the US, even if you got the asking price, the property would yield about €7-10K. So each party would be entitled to between €3.5-5K. If applicable closing costs need to be factored into the transaction. I am having difficulty finding this information that is UK related for the seller.



      Whatever you can do, it behooves you to work with your estranged spouse. Will she take a bit less than what she is owed? Even if it partially depletes your savings, it might be worth it. If she takes you to court to force the sale, those costs can wipe out your savings and yield nothing. By buying her out, you at least have a property on the asset sheet, where paying a lawyer is nothing but an expense.






      share|improve this answer













      Depending upon the divorce laws in your jurisdiction she could be entitle to 50% of the proceeds of the property sale no matter if she contributes to the payment or not. In some sense she may be doing you a big favor by contributing half. You may want to seek a lawyer's advice on all this because it is so jurisdiction dependent.



      Typically there are closing costs when selling a property. Here in the US, even if you got the asking price, the property would yield about €7-10K. So each party would be entitled to between €3.5-5K. If applicable closing costs need to be factored into the transaction. I am having difficulty finding this information that is UK related for the seller.



      Whatever you can do, it behooves you to work with your estranged spouse. Will she take a bit less than what she is owed? Even if it partially depletes your savings, it might be worth it. If she takes you to court to force the sale, those costs can wipe out your savings and yield nothing. By buying her out, you at least have a property on the asset sheet, where paying a lawyer is nothing but an expense.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      Pete B.Pete B.

      49.9k12108158




      49.9k12108158








      • 3





        The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

        – JBentley
        yesterday






      • 4





        Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

        – Joshua
        yesterday






      • 1





        This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

        – Dancrumb
        yesterday






      • 1





        Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

        – Richard Tingle
        yesterday






      • 1





        Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

        – RobV
        yesterday














      • 3





        The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

        – JBentley
        yesterday






      • 4





        Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

        – Joshua
        yesterday






      • 1





        This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

        – Dancrumb
        yesterday






      • 1





        Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

        – Richard Tingle
        yesterday






      • 1





        Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

        – RobV
        yesterday








      3




      3





      The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

      – JBentley
      yesterday





      The UK does not use the euro (€) so the question either has a wrong tag or the OP is converting to € for some reason in the question. I will add a comment on the question as well to ask the OP to clarify.

      – JBentley
      yesterday




      4




      4





      Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

      – Joshua
      yesterday





      Forcing the sale would be a bizarre result here as he is also trying to sell it.

      – Joshua
      yesterday




      1




      1





      This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

      – Dancrumb
      yesterday





      This is a good point about jurisdictional entitlements, but it's also worth noting that you and your spouse can reach any arrangement that you like and you're not bound by these entitlements if you're in mutual agreement. Thus, you could (for instance) agree on a buy-out value with your spouse as well as a payment schedule with acceleration on the occasion of a sale. Whatever you do, however amicable things are, be sure you get some legal representation to ensure that the agreement is iron clad (for both parties)

      – Dancrumb
      yesterday




      1




      1





      Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

      – Richard Tingle
      yesterday





      Surely a buy out would require Cloud to take on the full mortgage responsibility, which Cloud may be prepared to do but the bank is unlikely to be

      – Richard Tingle
      yesterday




      1




      1





      Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

      – RobV
      yesterday





      Typical UK fees on a sale would be approx £1000 in legal fees plus an average of 1.8% estate agent (aka realtor) commission though that can vary a lot depending on the level of competition in your area and if you use online realtors that offer fixed fee sales (though typically for a more basic service). With a fixed term mortgage there may also be an early repayment charge (ERC) that would add to seller costs when redeeming the mortgage

      – RobV
      yesterday











      19














      Anecdote: My grandparents gifted me and my girlfriend £30k so that we
      could buy our first house together, and I contributed a further £3k
      towards the deposit for a better mortgage rate. Over the next two
      years, I paid for the bathroom to be re-done at £7.5k, as well as the
      windows and doors for £2.5k, so the house went from being worth £210k
      to £250k... and then we broke up. She had contributed 50% to all the
      mortgage payments, and was entitled to 50% of the house - it cost me a
      further £20k to 'buy her out'.



      It was a lot of money to scrape together... but I ended up with a
      property and she went back to moving around and renting for a couple
      of years, so actually wound up a little worse off than myself - even
      after a £20k payment.



      In the grand scheme of things; 12,500 is a drop in the ocean. Having somewhere to live is better than nothing, and you'll still have a decent amount of savings behind you.



      I appreciate you no longer want to be in that particular location, and we can't tell you what to do, but whilst the house isn't selling and your ex-wife is offering you an out... I would take it.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

        – vikingsteve
        6 hours ago
















      19














      Anecdote: My grandparents gifted me and my girlfriend £30k so that we
      could buy our first house together, and I contributed a further £3k
      towards the deposit for a better mortgage rate. Over the next two
      years, I paid for the bathroom to be re-done at £7.5k, as well as the
      windows and doors for £2.5k, so the house went from being worth £210k
      to £250k... and then we broke up. She had contributed 50% to all the
      mortgage payments, and was entitled to 50% of the house - it cost me a
      further £20k to 'buy her out'.



      It was a lot of money to scrape together... but I ended up with a
      property and she went back to moving around and renting for a couple
      of years, so actually wound up a little worse off than myself - even
      after a £20k payment.



      In the grand scheme of things; 12,500 is a drop in the ocean. Having somewhere to live is better than nothing, and you'll still have a decent amount of savings behind you.



      I appreciate you no longer want to be in that particular location, and we can't tell you what to do, but whilst the house isn't selling and your ex-wife is offering you an out... I would take it.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

        – vikingsteve
        6 hours ago














      19












      19








      19







      Anecdote: My grandparents gifted me and my girlfriend £30k so that we
      could buy our first house together, and I contributed a further £3k
      towards the deposit for a better mortgage rate. Over the next two
      years, I paid for the bathroom to be re-done at £7.5k, as well as the
      windows and doors for £2.5k, so the house went from being worth £210k
      to £250k... and then we broke up. She had contributed 50% to all the
      mortgage payments, and was entitled to 50% of the house - it cost me a
      further £20k to 'buy her out'.



      It was a lot of money to scrape together... but I ended up with a
      property and she went back to moving around and renting for a couple
      of years, so actually wound up a little worse off than myself - even
      after a £20k payment.



      In the grand scheme of things; 12,500 is a drop in the ocean. Having somewhere to live is better than nothing, and you'll still have a decent amount of savings behind you.



      I appreciate you no longer want to be in that particular location, and we can't tell you what to do, but whilst the house isn't selling and your ex-wife is offering you an out... I would take it.






      share|improve this answer















      Anecdote: My grandparents gifted me and my girlfriend £30k so that we
      could buy our first house together, and I contributed a further £3k
      towards the deposit for a better mortgage rate. Over the next two
      years, I paid for the bathroom to be re-done at £7.5k, as well as the
      windows and doors for £2.5k, so the house went from being worth £210k
      to £250k... and then we broke up. She had contributed 50% to all the
      mortgage payments, and was entitled to 50% of the house - it cost me a
      further £20k to 'buy her out'.



      It was a lot of money to scrape together... but I ended up with a
      property and she went back to moving around and renting for a couple
      of years, so actually wound up a little worse off than myself - even
      after a £20k payment.



      In the grand scheme of things; 12,500 is a drop in the ocean. Having somewhere to live is better than nothing, and you'll still have a decent amount of savings behind you.



      I appreciate you no longer want to be in that particular location, and we can't tell you what to do, but whilst the house isn't selling and your ex-wife is offering you an out... I would take it.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 14 hours ago









      Oddthinking

      14916




      14916










      answered yesterday









      trashpandatrashpanda

      1,031522




      1,031522








      • 2





        I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

        – vikingsteve
        6 hours ago














      • 2





        I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

        – vikingsteve
        6 hours ago








      2




      2





      I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

      – vikingsteve
      6 hours ago





      I agree. 12,500 is a pretty good deal to be free of divorce related problems and then be a 100% home owner by yourself. Take the deal, pay her out, and look at the practicality that you own a house and are some years down the repayments already. Rent out a room or two in the house, if you have to.

      – vikingsteve
      6 hours ago











      9














      I am answering from the perspective of:




      We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.




      I would suggest you reach out to the estate agent (I'm assuming you have "conventionally" put it on the market rather than one of those 'sell your own house through our portal' outfits) to find out what the situation is there -- have they had any feedback from potential viewers, why don't they think it is getting any "bites"? Presumably they want to get their commission..?! Is it on 'Rightmove' and things like that. Maybe they are just rubbish.. What are their terms for moving to another agent? Is there anything obviously wrong with the house (e.g. it's in such a state of disrepair that it's "unmortgageable")?



      You can sell any property (within reason!) if you are prepared to compromise on price. If you haven't had even a single viewing it sounds like there is something you need to remedy with the listing / the price / the agent before looking at other options.



      Personally (I have a fairly high risk-tolerant attitude) I would buy her out (as part of a divorce agreement) on that basis, if I had reasonably stable job prospects (current employer / could find another) in your situation. Make sure you consult a good lawyer to see that the paperwork is done properly with "signing over" the deeds.



      Btw: It isn't clear whether she has "officially" asked (via the divorce procedure) or just unofficially, for you to buy her out. It sounds like you are on amicable terms so I would suggest you agree between yourselves and then get it officially recorded as part of the financial arrangements of the divorce. If you can agree it yourselves first rather than everything going through solicitors, both of your legal bills will be much lower! :)



      Source: went through something similar myself 18 months ago.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        9














        I am answering from the perspective of:




        We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.




        I would suggest you reach out to the estate agent (I'm assuming you have "conventionally" put it on the market rather than one of those 'sell your own house through our portal' outfits) to find out what the situation is there -- have they had any feedback from potential viewers, why don't they think it is getting any "bites"? Presumably they want to get their commission..?! Is it on 'Rightmove' and things like that. Maybe they are just rubbish.. What are their terms for moving to another agent? Is there anything obviously wrong with the house (e.g. it's in such a state of disrepair that it's "unmortgageable")?



        You can sell any property (within reason!) if you are prepared to compromise on price. If you haven't had even a single viewing it sounds like there is something you need to remedy with the listing / the price / the agent before looking at other options.



        Personally (I have a fairly high risk-tolerant attitude) I would buy her out (as part of a divorce agreement) on that basis, if I had reasonably stable job prospects (current employer / could find another) in your situation. Make sure you consult a good lawyer to see that the paperwork is done properly with "signing over" the deeds.



        Btw: It isn't clear whether she has "officially" asked (via the divorce procedure) or just unofficially, for you to buy her out. It sounds like you are on amicable terms so I would suggest you agree between yourselves and then get it officially recorded as part of the financial arrangements of the divorce. If you can agree it yourselves first rather than everything going through solicitors, both of your legal bills will be much lower! :)



        Source: went through something similar myself 18 months ago.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          9












          9








          9







          I am answering from the perspective of:




          We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.




          I would suggest you reach out to the estate agent (I'm assuming you have "conventionally" put it on the market rather than one of those 'sell your own house through our portal' outfits) to find out what the situation is there -- have they had any feedback from potential viewers, why don't they think it is getting any "bites"? Presumably they want to get their commission..?! Is it on 'Rightmove' and things like that. Maybe they are just rubbish.. What are their terms for moving to another agent? Is there anything obviously wrong with the house (e.g. it's in such a state of disrepair that it's "unmortgageable")?



          You can sell any property (within reason!) if you are prepared to compromise on price. If you haven't had even a single viewing it sounds like there is something you need to remedy with the listing / the price / the agent before looking at other options.



          Personally (I have a fairly high risk-tolerant attitude) I would buy her out (as part of a divorce agreement) on that basis, if I had reasonably stable job prospects (current employer / could find another) in your situation. Make sure you consult a good lawyer to see that the paperwork is done properly with "signing over" the deeds.



          Btw: It isn't clear whether she has "officially" asked (via the divorce procedure) or just unofficially, for you to buy her out. It sounds like you are on amicable terms so I would suggest you agree between yourselves and then get it officially recorded as part of the financial arrangements of the divorce. If you can agree it yourselves first rather than everything going through solicitors, both of your legal bills will be much lower! :)



          Source: went through something similar myself 18 months ago.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          I am answering from the perspective of:




          We have recently separated (in November). At the time, we had had the property on the market for a couple of months. We have left the property on the market since and still have yet to have a single viewing.




          I would suggest you reach out to the estate agent (I'm assuming you have "conventionally" put it on the market rather than one of those 'sell your own house through our portal' outfits) to find out what the situation is there -- have they had any feedback from potential viewers, why don't they think it is getting any "bites"? Presumably they want to get their commission..?! Is it on 'Rightmove' and things like that. Maybe they are just rubbish.. What are their terms for moving to another agent? Is there anything obviously wrong with the house (e.g. it's in such a state of disrepair that it's "unmortgageable")?



          You can sell any property (within reason!) if you are prepared to compromise on price. If you haven't had even a single viewing it sounds like there is something you need to remedy with the listing / the price / the agent before looking at other options.



          Personally (I have a fairly high risk-tolerant attitude) I would buy her out (as part of a divorce agreement) on that basis, if I had reasonably stable job prospects (current employer / could find another) in your situation. Make sure you consult a good lawyer to see that the paperwork is done properly with "signing over" the deeds.



          Btw: It isn't clear whether she has "officially" asked (via the divorce procedure) or just unofficially, for you to buy her out. It sounds like you are on amicable terms so I would suggest you agree between yourselves and then get it officially recorded as part of the financial arrangements of the divorce. If you can agree it yourselves first rather than everything going through solicitors, both of your legal bills will be much lower! :)



          Source: went through something similar myself 18 months ago.







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited yesterday





















          New contributor




          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered yesterday









          user81798user81798

          1013




          1013




          New contributor




          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          user81798 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              5














              UK property market is in limbo right now; nobody is buying or selling unless they have to due to the uncertainties of brexit. This has been the case for half a year or so, but is getting really bad right now according to estate agents I know. Autumn and winter are also bad times to sell properties anyway.



              If you and your wife (and your divorce lawyers) were amenable to waiting for a while, the situation is likely to improve with regard to getting viewings and being able to sell the property. Take it off the market now, and put it back on the market in early Summer. (this assumes that Brexit is resolved by then, of course, but even if not, summer is always better for selling houses)



              If you cannot wait, then the you have the option of selling the house by auction. This typically brings in a lower valuation than a normal sale, and the amount you'll get for the house is by no means certain, but it is a way of guaranteeing a sale (though pragmatically, you will likely want to put a reserve price on the auction to avoid selling for less than you can afford).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago
















              5














              UK property market is in limbo right now; nobody is buying or selling unless they have to due to the uncertainties of brexit. This has been the case for half a year or so, but is getting really bad right now according to estate agents I know. Autumn and winter are also bad times to sell properties anyway.



              If you and your wife (and your divorce lawyers) were amenable to waiting for a while, the situation is likely to improve with regard to getting viewings and being able to sell the property. Take it off the market now, and put it back on the market in early Summer. (this assumes that Brexit is resolved by then, of course, but even if not, summer is always better for selling houses)



              If you cannot wait, then the you have the option of selling the house by auction. This typically brings in a lower valuation than a normal sale, and the amount you'll get for the house is by no means certain, but it is a way of guaranteeing a sale (though pragmatically, you will likely want to put a reserve price on the auction to avoid selling for less than you can afford).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago














              5












              5








              5







              UK property market is in limbo right now; nobody is buying or selling unless they have to due to the uncertainties of brexit. This has been the case for half a year or so, but is getting really bad right now according to estate agents I know. Autumn and winter are also bad times to sell properties anyway.



              If you and your wife (and your divorce lawyers) were amenable to waiting for a while, the situation is likely to improve with regard to getting viewings and being able to sell the property. Take it off the market now, and put it back on the market in early Summer. (this assumes that Brexit is resolved by then, of course, but even if not, summer is always better for selling houses)



              If you cannot wait, then the you have the option of selling the house by auction. This typically brings in a lower valuation than a normal sale, and the amount you'll get for the house is by no means certain, but it is a way of guaranteeing a sale (though pragmatically, you will likely want to put a reserve price on the auction to avoid selling for less than you can afford).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              UK property market is in limbo right now; nobody is buying or selling unless they have to due to the uncertainties of brexit. This has been the case for half a year or so, but is getting really bad right now according to estate agents I know. Autumn and winter are also bad times to sell properties anyway.



              If you and your wife (and your divorce lawyers) were amenable to waiting for a while, the situation is likely to improve with regard to getting viewings and being able to sell the property. Take it off the market now, and put it back on the market in early Summer. (this assumes that Brexit is resolved by then, of course, but even if not, summer is always better for selling houses)



              If you cannot wait, then the you have the option of selling the house by auction. This typically brings in a lower valuation than a normal sale, and the amount you'll get for the house is by no means certain, but it is a way of guaranteeing a sale (though pragmatically, you will likely want to put a reserve price on the auction to avoid selling for less than you can afford).







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered yesterday









              SpudleySpudley

              1511




              1511




              New contributor




              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Spudley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.













              • How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago



















              • How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago

















              How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

              – Cloud
              4 hours ago





              How long until we know what is happening in the Uk then?

              – Cloud
              4 hours ago











              4














              I purchased a home Florida many years ago for 165,000. I subsequently took a job in New York and had to put the house up for sale. I listed the house for what I paid for it, 165K. after a couple of monhts my CFO asked me if the house has sold. I told him no because people were not offering what the house was worth. He corrected me by saying "The house is worth what the market is willing to pay"



              This is a tough lesson but a true one. Regardless of the marital situation, your asset is worth what the market will pay. I recommend you list the home at a price that will sell, take your loss and then go live where you want to live. Holding on to an asset you do not want to own simply makes no logical sense.



              I suggest move on and be happy. 10 years from now you will not miss a few thousand euros.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago











              • Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

                – Oscar Bravo
                4 hours ago
















              4














              I purchased a home Florida many years ago for 165,000. I subsequently took a job in New York and had to put the house up for sale. I listed the house for what I paid for it, 165K. after a couple of monhts my CFO asked me if the house has sold. I told him no because people were not offering what the house was worth. He corrected me by saying "The house is worth what the market is willing to pay"



              This is a tough lesson but a true one. Regardless of the marital situation, your asset is worth what the market will pay. I recommend you list the home at a price that will sell, take your loss and then go live where you want to live. Holding on to an asset you do not want to own simply makes no logical sense.



              I suggest move on and be happy. 10 years from now you will not miss a few thousand euros.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago











              • Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

                – Oscar Bravo
                4 hours ago














              4












              4








              4







              I purchased a home Florida many years ago for 165,000. I subsequently took a job in New York and had to put the house up for sale. I listed the house for what I paid for it, 165K. after a couple of monhts my CFO asked me if the house has sold. I told him no because people were not offering what the house was worth. He corrected me by saying "The house is worth what the market is willing to pay"



              This is a tough lesson but a true one. Regardless of the marital situation, your asset is worth what the market will pay. I recommend you list the home at a price that will sell, take your loss and then go live where you want to live. Holding on to an asset you do not want to own simply makes no logical sense.



              I suggest move on and be happy. 10 years from now you will not miss a few thousand euros.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              I purchased a home Florida many years ago for 165,000. I subsequently took a job in New York and had to put the house up for sale. I listed the house for what I paid for it, 165K. after a couple of monhts my CFO asked me if the house has sold. I told him no because people were not offering what the house was worth. He corrected me by saying "The house is worth what the market is willing to pay"



              This is a tough lesson but a true one. Regardless of the marital situation, your asset is worth what the market will pay. I recommend you list the home at a price that will sell, take your loss and then go live where you want to live. Holding on to an asset you do not want to own simply makes no logical sense.



              I suggest move on and be happy. 10 years from now you will not miss a few thousand euros.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 19 hours ago









              JimalayaJimalaya

              411




              411




              New contributor




              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Jimalaya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.













              • Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago











              • Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

                – Oscar Bravo
                4 hours ago



















              • Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

                – Cloud
                4 hours ago











              • Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

                – Oscar Bravo
                4 hours ago

















              Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

              – Cloud
              4 hours ago





              Thanks, this is actually a great answer.

              – Cloud
              4 hours ago













              Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

              – Oscar Bravo
              4 hours ago





              Exactly. Houses (and everything else) are worth what the market will pay. Nothing to do with what you paid initially. Put it another way, if the price had risen to 150K, would you still sell it for 114K, because that's what you paid for it?

              – Oscar Bravo
              4 hours ago











              2














              Buy her out as part of the property settlement and only as part of the property settlement.



              Don't, whatever you do, is buy her out without a property settlement. Nobody cares who's name is on the property when it comes to settlement so you'd be just funding her legal fight against you at the cost of being able to defend yourself and she'll still take half the house.



              Even though she isn't living there, she still has to pay half the mortgage as it's her name on the loan. Everything she has to spend now is less she can spend on lawyers.



              Whilst you're in a position of power (more or less), negotiate like hell and try your best to settle out of court. Do everything you can to avoid court because lawyers will take the lot.



              My ex never gave me any choice and used the court system to hurt me. I spent four years fighting and the only winners were the lawyers.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                2














                Buy her out as part of the property settlement and only as part of the property settlement.



                Don't, whatever you do, is buy her out without a property settlement. Nobody cares who's name is on the property when it comes to settlement so you'd be just funding her legal fight against you at the cost of being able to defend yourself and she'll still take half the house.



                Even though she isn't living there, she still has to pay half the mortgage as it's her name on the loan. Everything she has to spend now is less she can spend on lawyers.



                Whilst you're in a position of power (more or less), negotiate like hell and try your best to settle out of court. Do everything you can to avoid court because lawyers will take the lot.



                My ex never gave me any choice and used the court system to hurt me. I spent four years fighting and the only winners were the lawyers.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  Buy her out as part of the property settlement and only as part of the property settlement.



                  Don't, whatever you do, is buy her out without a property settlement. Nobody cares who's name is on the property when it comes to settlement so you'd be just funding her legal fight against you at the cost of being able to defend yourself and she'll still take half the house.



                  Even though she isn't living there, she still has to pay half the mortgage as it's her name on the loan. Everything she has to spend now is less she can spend on lawyers.



                  Whilst you're in a position of power (more or less), negotiate like hell and try your best to settle out of court. Do everything you can to avoid court because lawyers will take the lot.



                  My ex never gave me any choice and used the court system to hurt me. I spent four years fighting and the only winners were the lawyers.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  Buy her out as part of the property settlement and only as part of the property settlement.



                  Don't, whatever you do, is buy her out without a property settlement. Nobody cares who's name is on the property when it comes to settlement so you'd be just funding her legal fight against you at the cost of being able to defend yourself and she'll still take half the house.



                  Even though she isn't living there, she still has to pay half the mortgage as it's her name on the loan. Everything she has to spend now is less she can spend on lawyers.



                  Whilst you're in a position of power (more or less), negotiate like hell and try your best to settle out of court. Do everything you can to avoid court because lawyers will take the lot.



                  My ex never gave me any choice and used the court system to hurt me. I spent four years fighting and the only winners were the lawyers.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  ThorneThorne

                  1371




                  1371




                  New contributor




                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Thorne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      1














                      I can't speak for any of the legal matters, such as what she's entitled to due to divorce, what kind of legal agreement you need, etc, but there's something else you might want to consider: if she wants you to buy her out, she's asking you to assume all the risk afterwards. Even if you're on good terms, it makes no sense for her to get 50% of any profit by sandbagging you with a property that obviously won't rent or won't sell and that could sink much lower. If she can't or isn't willing to stick around and ride out the risk, she shouldn't be entitled to an equal payout, even at its current value. I understand that you don't want to be mean about it and that you still care about her, but if she really wants what's best for you, she can't take half the equity and then leave you with a risk like that. Try to negotiate buying her out for less than 50%.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                        – Cloud
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago
















                      1














                      I can't speak for any of the legal matters, such as what she's entitled to due to divorce, what kind of legal agreement you need, etc, but there's something else you might want to consider: if she wants you to buy her out, she's asking you to assume all the risk afterwards. Even if you're on good terms, it makes no sense for her to get 50% of any profit by sandbagging you with a property that obviously won't rent or won't sell and that could sink much lower. If she can't or isn't willing to stick around and ride out the risk, she shouldn't be entitled to an equal payout, even at its current value. I understand that you don't want to be mean about it and that you still care about her, but if she really wants what's best for you, she can't take half the equity and then leave you with a risk like that. Try to negotiate buying her out for less than 50%.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                        – Cloud
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      I can't speak for any of the legal matters, such as what she's entitled to due to divorce, what kind of legal agreement you need, etc, but there's something else you might want to consider: if she wants you to buy her out, she's asking you to assume all the risk afterwards. Even if you're on good terms, it makes no sense for her to get 50% of any profit by sandbagging you with a property that obviously won't rent or won't sell and that could sink much lower. If she can't or isn't willing to stick around and ride out the risk, she shouldn't be entitled to an equal payout, even at its current value. I understand that you don't want to be mean about it and that you still care about her, but if she really wants what's best for you, she can't take half the equity and then leave you with a risk like that. Try to negotiate buying her out for less than 50%.






                      share|improve this answer













                      I can't speak for any of the legal matters, such as what she's entitled to due to divorce, what kind of legal agreement you need, etc, but there's something else you might want to consider: if she wants you to buy her out, she's asking you to assume all the risk afterwards. Even if you're on good terms, it makes no sense for her to get 50% of any profit by sandbagging you with a property that obviously won't rent or won't sell and that could sink much lower. If she can't or isn't willing to stick around and ride out the risk, she shouldn't be entitled to an equal payout, even at its current value. I understand that you don't want to be mean about it and that you still care about her, but if she really wants what's best for you, she can't take half the equity and then leave you with a risk like that. Try to negotiate buying her out for less than 50%.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 7 hours ago









                      CMBCMB

                      296




                      296













                      • This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                        – Cloud
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago



















                      • This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                        – Cloud
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago






                      • 1





                        @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                        – CMB
                        4 hours ago

















                      This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                      – Cloud
                      4 hours ago





                      This is the problem.. I don't want to cheat her out of money, but I also don't want to be in trouble myself.

                      – Cloud
                      4 hours ago




                      1




                      1





                      @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                      – CMB
                      4 hours ago





                      @Cloud I understand not wanting to hurt someone, but it's really not cheating her. People have to say no to opportunities all the time because they can't afford them or don't want to risk them. If she can't afford to continue paying or doesn't want to, then maybe it's not an opportunity she was meant to have. On the plus side, she's also free from the risk if it dives. Kind of like cashing out at the gambling table before the odds can go against you. To me it seems unfair to want half the reward while leaving any future risk to you. It might be worth talking about.

                      – CMB
                      4 hours ago




                      1




                      1





                      @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                      – CMB
                      4 hours ago





                      @Cloud This is assuming you don't sell the house for a loss immediately but decide to hold out for a better market after your ex sells out. Jimalaya made a good point, too. Sometimes it better to just call it quits and get out with what you can get. If you both decide to sell it at an offered price as soon as possible, then ignore me and split 50/50.

                      – CMB
                      4 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What are all the squawk codes?

                      What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

                      Hudsonelva