Why did the Baron and Piter de Vries fear the Truthsayer?












3















The Baron does not want to know how




Lady Jessica and Paul Atreides die,




out of fear of the Bene Gesserit Truthsayer; or at least that is what Jessica deduces. The same goes for Piter de Vries.



But it seems obvious that the purpose of the Harkonnens attacking the Atreides is to




kill the family/bloodline.




Since the Empreror himself is involved in the plot, why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer, and why do they fear to reveal their whereabouts?










share|improve this question









New contributor




piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    The Baron does not want to know how




    Lady Jessica and Paul Atreides die,




    out of fear of the Bene Gesserit Truthsayer; or at least that is what Jessica deduces. The same goes for Piter de Vries.



    But it seems obvious that the purpose of the Harkonnens attacking the Atreides is to




    kill the family/bloodline.




    Since the Empreror himself is involved in the plot, why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer, and why do they fear to reveal their whereabouts?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      3












      3








      3








      The Baron does not want to know how




      Lady Jessica and Paul Atreides die,




      out of fear of the Bene Gesserit Truthsayer; or at least that is what Jessica deduces. The same goes for Piter de Vries.



      But it seems obvious that the purpose of the Harkonnens attacking the Atreides is to




      kill the family/bloodline.




      Since the Empreror himself is involved in the plot, why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer, and why do they fear to reveal their whereabouts?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      The Baron does not want to know how




      Lady Jessica and Paul Atreides die,




      out of fear of the Bene Gesserit Truthsayer; or at least that is what Jessica deduces. The same goes for Piter de Vries.



      But it seems obvious that the purpose of the Harkonnens attacking the Atreides is to




      kill the family/bloodline.




      Since the Empreror himself is involved in the plot, why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer, and why do they fear to reveal their whereabouts?







      dune






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      piwi













      New contributor




      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      piwipiwi

      1264




      1264




      New contributor




      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      piwi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          It's not that the Baron doesn't want to watch them die, it's that he wants plausible deniability as to the reason and manner of their deaths. He wants to be able to stand in the presence of the Truthsayer and say "I didn't kill the boy or the woman and I didn't order their deaths" and for it to be the strict truth. By using a proxy (Piter) he allows himself the victory he wants, the ending of the Atreides line in as unpleasant a way possible without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete.



          As to why the Emperor wants Paul and Jessica, this is down to the Bene Gesserit. They want to take them into custody (presumably in exile on their Chapter House planet) until it's time to bring the final stage of their breeding plan to fruition, by wedding Paul to a Harkonnen female, sealing the bloodlines and creating their superhuman.




          “We may be able to salvage you. Doubtful, but possible. But for your
          father, nothing.
          When you’ve learned to accept that as a fact, you’ve
          learned a real Bene Gesserit lesson.”







          share|improve this answer
























          • "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

            – piwi
            38 mins ago











          • @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

            – Valorum
            21 mins ago





















          3














          In the Dune-verse at the time of the Dune novel, Emperor Shaddam IV is not all-powerful - in fact, he is often portrayed as a puppet of the various other powers. Politically, his influence is regulated by the Landsraat, and the other powers (Space Guild, Bene Gesserit, other noble houses, and other minor powers) contribute their own power (or withhold it) to manipulate the Emperor to their own ends. There are always plots going on, and the books go to great lengths to explain the thought-processes of the key players. Even Paul, as he claims the throne and the Emperor's daughter to be his "wife", sees that there are numerous plots afoot and that he must take care not to over-reach. Of course, he eventually takes a damn-the-torpedoes approach and plunges the galaxy into war (he laments at one point that trillions have been killed in his wars), but that comes later.



          So, in this instance, the Harkonnens and the Emperor both know that if their plan becomes public knowledge, they could be censured by the other powers - Space Guild could withhold interplanetary travel, and thus access to the spice, and the BGs[1] could withhold their power to influence the gene-pool and see the future, etc.



          [1] the bald ladies wot sees the future, not the 70s disco band






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago











          • @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

            – Sam
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

            – Darren
            1 hour ago











          • @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

            – Steve-O
            43 mins ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "186"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          piwi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204224%2fwhy-did-the-baron-and-piter-de-vries-fear-the-truthsayer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          It's not that the Baron doesn't want to watch them die, it's that he wants plausible deniability as to the reason and manner of their deaths. He wants to be able to stand in the presence of the Truthsayer and say "I didn't kill the boy or the woman and I didn't order their deaths" and for it to be the strict truth. By using a proxy (Piter) he allows himself the victory he wants, the ending of the Atreides line in as unpleasant a way possible without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete.



          As to why the Emperor wants Paul and Jessica, this is down to the Bene Gesserit. They want to take them into custody (presumably in exile on their Chapter House planet) until it's time to bring the final stage of their breeding plan to fruition, by wedding Paul to a Harkonnen female, sealing the bloodlines and creating their superhuman.




          “We may be able to salvage you. Doubtful, but possible. But for your
          father, nothing.
          When you’ve learned to accept that as a fact, you’ve
          learned a real Bene Gesserit lesson.”







          share|improve this answer
























          • "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

            – piwi
            38 mins ago











          • @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

            – Valorum
            21 mins ago


















          5














          It's not that the Baron doesn't want to watch them die, it's that he wants plausible deniability as to the reason and manner of their deaths. He wants to be able to stand in the presence of the Truthsayer and say "I didn't kill the boy or the woman and I didn't order their deaths" and for it to be the strict truth. By using a proxy (Piter) he allows himself the victory he wants, the ending of the Atreides line in as unpleasant a way possible without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete.



          As to why the Emperor wants Paul and Jessica, this is down to the Bene Gesserit. They want to take them into custody (presumably in exile on their Chapter House planet) until it's time to bring the final stage of their breeding plan to fruition, by wedding Paul to a Harkonnen female, sealing the bloodlines and creating their superhuman.




          “We may be able to salvage you. Doubtful, but possible. But for your
          father, nothing.
          When you’ve learned to accept that as a fact, you’ve
          learned a real Bene Gesserit lesson.”







          share|improve this answer
























          • "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

            – piwi
            38 mins ago











          • @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

            – Valorum
            21 mins ago
















          5












          5








          5







          It's not that the Baron doesn't want to watch them die, it's that he wants plausible deniability as to the reason and manner of their deaths. He wants to be able to stand in the presence of the Truthsayer and say "I didn't kill the boy or the woman and I didn't order their deaths" and for it to be the strict truth. By using a proxy (Piter) he allows himself the victory he wants, the ending of the Atreides line in as unpleasant a way possible without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete.



          As to why the Emperor wants Paul and Jessica, this is down to the Bene Gesserit. They want to take them into custody (presumably in exile on their Chapter House planet) until it's time to bring the final stage of their breeding plan to fruition, by wedding Paul to a Harkonnen female, sealing the bloodlines and creating their superhuman.




          “We may be able to salvage you. Doubtful, but possible. But for your
          father, nothing.
          When you’ve learned to accept that as a fact, you’ve
          learned a real Bene Gesserit lesson.”







          share|improve this answer













          It's not that the Baron doesn't want to watch them die, it's that he wants plausible deniability as to the reason and manner of their deaths. He wants to be able to stand in the presence of the Truthsayer and say "I didn't kill the boy or the woman and I didn't order their deaths" and for it to be the strict truth. By using a proxy (Piter) he allows himself the victory he wants, the ending of the Atreides line in as unpleasant a way possible without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete.



          As to why the Emperor wants Paul and Jessica, this is down to the Bene Gesserit. They want to take them into custody (presumably in exile on their Chapter House planet) until it's time to bring the final stage of their breeding plan to fruition, by wedding Paul to a Harkonnen female, sealing the bloodlines and creating their superhuman.




          “We may be able to salvage you. Doubtful, but possible. But for your
          father, nothing.
          When you’ve learned to accept that as a fact, you’ve
          learned a real Bene Gesserit lesson.”








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          ValorumValorum

          400k10529113139




          400k10529113139













          • "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

            – piwi
            38 mins ago











          • @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

            – Valorum
            21 mins ago





















          • "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

            – piwi
            38 mins ago











          • @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

            – Valorum
            21 mins ago



















          "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

          – piwi
          38 mins ago





          "without breaching his evident bargain with the Emperor, that he'll deliver up the boy and his mother alive after the invasion is complete." Is there any quote that supports this? Or at what point is this revealed? I may have missed this part.

          – piwi
          38 mins ago













          @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

          – Valorum
          21 mins ago







          @piwi - The closest we get is when the Baron says "Remember–I am giving up the boy. You heard what the traitor said about the lad’s training. They are alike, this mother and son–deadly.”. But we do know there was a 'thopter set aside specifically for extracting Paul and Jessica, so he must have had some plans for them, other then simply killing them when found. In general you don't keep people alive if you want them dead :-)

          – Valorum
          21 mins ago















          3














          In the Dune-verse at the time of the Dune novel, Emperor Shaddam IV is not all-powerful - in fact, he is often portrayed as a puppet of the various other powers. Politically, his influence is regulated by the Landsraat, and the other powers (Space Guild, Bene Gesserit, other noble houses, and other minor powers) contribute their own power (or withhold it) to manipulate the Emperor to their own ends. There are always plots going on, and the books go to great lengths to explain the thought-processes of the key players. Even Paul, as he claims the throne and the Emperor's daughter to be his "wife", sees that there are numerous plots afoot and that he must take care not to over-reach. Of course, he eventually takes a damn-the-torpedoes approach and plunges the galaxy into war (he laments at one point that trillions have been killed in his wars), but that comes later.



          So, in this instance, the Harkonnens and the Emperor both know that if their plan becomes public knowledge, they could be censured by the other powers - Space Guild could withhold interplanetary travel, and thus access to the spice, and the BGs[1] could withhold their power to influence the gene-pool and see the future, etc.



          [1] the bald ladies wot sees the future, not the 70s disco band






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago











          • @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

            – Sam
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

            – Darren
            1 hour ago











          • @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

            – Steve-O
            43 mins ago
















          3














          In the Dune-verse at the time of the Dune novel, Emperor Shaddam IV is not all-powerful - in fact, he is often portrayed as a puppet of the various other powers. Politically, his influence is regulated by the Landsraat, and the other powers (Space Guild, Bene Gesserit, other noble houses, and other minor powers) contribute their own power (or withhold it) to manipulate the Emperor to their own ends. There are always plots going on, and the books go to great lengths to explain the thought-processes of the key players. Even Paul, as he claims the throne and the Emperor's daughter to be his "wife", sees that there are numerous plots afoot and that he must take care not to over-reach. Of course, he eventually takes a damn-the-torpedoes approach and plunges the galaxy into war (he laments at one point that trillions have been killed in his wars), but that comes later.



          So, in this instance, the Harkonnens and the Emperor both know that if their plan becomes public knowledge, they could be censured by the other powers - Space Guild could withhold interplanetary travel, and thus access to the spice, and the BGs[1] could withhold their power to influence the gene-pool and see the future, etc.



          [1] the bald ladies wot sees the future, not the 70s disco band






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago











          • @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

            – Sam
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

            – Darren
            1 hour ago











          • @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

            – Steve-O
            43 mins ago














          3












          3








          3







          In the Dune-verse at the time of the Dune novel, Emperor Shaddam IV is not all-powerful - in fact, he is often portrayed as a puppet of the various other powers. Politically, his influence is regulated by the Landsraat, and the other powers (Space Guild, Bene Gesserit, other noble houses, and other minor powers) contribute their own power (or withhold it) to manipulate the Emperor to their own ends. There are always plots going on, and the books go to great lengths to explain the thought-processes of the key players. Even Paul, as he claims the throne and the Emperor's daughter to be his "wife", sees that there are numerous plots afoot and that he must take care not to over-reach. Of course, he eventually takes a damn-the-torpedoes approach and plunges the galaxy into war (he laments at one point that trillions have been killed in his wars), but that comes later.



          So, in this instance, the Harkonnens and the Emperor both know that if their plan becomes public knowledge, they could be censured by the other powers - Space Guild could withhold interplanetary travel, and thus access to the spice, and the BGs[1] could withhold their power to influence the gene-pool and see the future, etc.



          [1] the bald ladies wot sees the future, not the 70s disco band






          share|improve this answer













          In the Dune-verse at the time of the Dune novel, Emperor Shaddam IV is not all-powerful - in fact, he is often portrayed as a puppet of the various other powers. Politically, his influence is regulated by the Landsraat, and the other powers (Space Guild, Bene Gesserit, other noble houses, and other minor powers) contribute their own power (or withhold it) to manipulate the Emperor to their own ends. There are always plots going on, and the books go to great lengths to explain the thought-processes of the key players. Even Paul, as he claims the throne and the Emperor's daughter to be his "wife", sees that there are numerous plots afoot and that he must take care not to over-reach. Of course, he eventually takes a damn-the-torpedoes approach and plunges the galaxy into war (he laments at one point that trillions have been killed in his wars), but that comes later.



          So, in this instance, the Harkonnens and the Emperor both know that if their plan becomes public knowledge, they could be censured by the other powers - Space Guild could withhold interplanetary travel, and thus access to the spice, and the BGs[1] could withhold their power to influence the gene-pool and see the future, etc.



          [1] the bald ladies wot sees the future, not the 70s disco band







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          SamSam

          22828




          22828













          • Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago











          • @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

            – Sam
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

            – Darren
            1 hour ago











          • @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

            – Steve-O
            43 mins ago



















          • Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago











          • @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

            – Sam
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

            – Darren
            1 hour ago











          • @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

            – piwi
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

            – Steve-O
            43 mins ago

















          Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

          – piwi
          1 hour ago





          Thanks for this explanation, but I don't understand how this answers the question. Knowing how Paul and his mother die does not prevent from revealing the Baron and the Emperor are involved in this plot.

          – piwi
          1 hour ago













          @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

          – Sam
          1 hour ago





          @piwi - I am answering your question, "why would they fear to be questioned by a Truthsayer?" The answer also covers the details on the "whereabouts" because that information would just further point to the direct involvement of the Emperor and the Baron who are trying to avoid being implicated in the deaths.

          – Sam
          1 hour ago




          1




          1





          @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

          – Darren
          1 hour ago





          @piwi, it's plausible deniability init? "Are they dead?". "I dunno, they might be, they not be. I didn't see them die and no one has told me how they die.".

          – Darren
          1 hour ago













          @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

          – piwi
          1 hour ago





          @Sam So the question was not specific enough I guess, I am really seeking an answer in the context of the attempt to get rid of Jessica and Paul.

          – piwi
          1 hour ago




          1




          1





          @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

          – Steve-O
          43 mins ago





          @piwi Now you know how the Truthsayers feel.

          – Steve-O
          43 mins ago










          piwi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          piwi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          piwi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          piwi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204224%2fwhy-did-the-baron-and-piter-de-vries-fear-the-truthsayer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          What are all the squawk codes?

          What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

          Hudsonelva