Staying grounded












8












$begingroup$


I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!



Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:



 1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …


Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).



Hint 1:




I can write the pattern in eight words.




Hint 2:




Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.




Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:



Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris
    19 hours ago
















8












$begingroup$


I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!



Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:



 1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …


Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).



Hint 1:




I can write the pattern in eight words.




Hint 2:




Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.




Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:



Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris
    19 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$


I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!



Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:



 1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …


Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).



Hint 1:




I can write the pattern in eight words.




Hint 2:




Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.




Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:



Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!



Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:



 1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …


Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).



Hint 1:




I can write the pattern in eight words.




Hint 2:




Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.




Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:



Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.







mathematics number-sequence






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









Fabian RölingFabian Röling

1839




1839








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris
    19 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris
    19 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
$endgroup$
– Chris
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
As a Hint for future puzzles don't add hints unless it becomes obvious they are needed. Either the hint is necessary to solve the puzzle (in which case its not a hint and should be part of the puzzle) or it is a way of making the puzzle easier which isn't needed before people have even had a go at solving it (or if you think it is too hard then again, incorporate the hints into the puzzle itself)! This is a great puzzle though.
$endgroup$
– Chris
19 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

I think you are




Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.




So for example




The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.




The next 10 numbers will be




5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6

i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc




Title




This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Omega Krypton
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabian Röling
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78790%2fstaying-grounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13












$begingroup$

I think you are




Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.




So for example




The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.




The next 10 numbers will be




5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6

i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc




Title




This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Omega Krypton
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabian Röling
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    yesterday
















13












$begingroup$

I think you are




Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.




So for example




The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.




The next 10 numbers will be




5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6

i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc




Title




This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Omega Krypton
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabian Röling
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    yesterday














13












13








13





$begingroup$

I think you are




Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.




So for example




The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.




The next 10 numbers will be




5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6

i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc




Title




This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I think you are




Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.




So for example




The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.




The next 10 numbers will be




5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6

i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc




Title




This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









hexominohexomino

38.4k2113181




38.4k2113181








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Omega Krypton
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabian Röling
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    yesterday














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Omega Krypton
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
    $endgroup$
    – Fabian Röling
    yesterday








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
    $endgroup$
    – hexomino
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
yesterday






$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
yesterday














$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
yesterday






$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
yesterday






1




1




$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
yesterday




$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78790%2fstaying-grounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

What are all the squawk codes?

What are differences between VBoxVGA, VMSVGA and VBoxSVGA in VirtualBox?

Hudsonelva